Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> MARCH 26, 2025 <br /> Ms. Sangeleer second. All were in favor. <br /> 25 Wilsons Grove <br /> Sitting on this hearing are the four regular Board members and Mr. Reidy. <br /> Attorney Christopher Kirrane represented the homeowners. The plans are being <br /> revised and were not submitted in time for the Board. He requested an extension <br /> until Wednesday, April 23, 2025. <br /> Mr. Reidy made a motion to accept Attorney Kirrane's request for extension until <br /> April 23, 2025. Ms. Sangeleer second. All were in favor. <br /> 119 Daniels Island Road <br /> Attorney Rob Mills represents New Seabury Homes. Also present is Brian Yergatian, <br /> with BSC Group, and Nick Galanis, with New Seabury. <br /> Attorney Mr. Mills was not sure the reason this project requires a meeting with the <br /> ZBA. He believes this lot is within the New Seabury Special Permit that was issued <br /> in 1964. All lots located within the New Seabury Special Permit are exempt from any <br /> zoning setbacks. <br /> Mr. Bonvie asked if these documents were provided prior to the filing of the <br /> application. <br /> Mr. Mills handed Mr. Morris the 1964 Special Permit and supplemental documents. <br /> Mr. Yergatian presented the application. He stated that variance relief is necessary <br /> from Section 174-33. This lot consists of 2.23 acres that is 100% within land subject <br /> to coastal storm flowage. The project obtained approval from Board of Health for the <br /> installation of a nitrogen reducing alternative system, and was issued an Order of <br /> Conditions with the Conservation Commission after several meetings, and at their <br /> request, reduced the size of the house and impacts. <br /> Mr. Yergatian believes that lot shape and topography are 100% valid reasons to seek <br /> relief, and the property is entirely in the wetlands. If this site had a higher elevation, <br /> it would not require relief under land subject to coastal storm flowage. The lot <br /> coverage under the old methodology would be 3.9% because it is two lots. He also <br /> believes that this project does not require zoning setbacks because it is under the <br /> New Seabury Special Permit. <br /> 6 <br />