Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> APRIL 23, 2025 <br /> This lot is split zoned between R-5 and C-3. In my opinion, if they keep the project <br /> entirely in the C-3 portion of the lot, they can apply for a PB Special Permit assuming <br /> it is still Med. to Large Scale and they would also then go through Plan Review <br /> Committee. <br /> The Site Layout Plan does not show the property lines nor access to ways. It also <br /> proposes temporary access and no permanent emergency access. The plans further <br /> provide no zoning analysis. No decommissioning plan has been submitted. No glare <br /> study has been submitted. <br /> "Their presentation indicates Solar is only allowed in I-1 and that is a <br /> misrepresentation. It should be clearly communicated both on the record and in the <br /> decision that: <br /> 1. All zones allow for roof mounted solar, <br /> 2. Small scale ground mounted solar is allowed in all districts as of right as an <br /> accessory use per S. 174-45.7 B.1.; <br /> 3. Med./Large Scale Ground Mounted Solar is allowed in C-2 via a PB Special <br /> Permit per S. 174-45.7 B.2.; <br /> 4. Med./Large Scale Ground Mounted Solar is allowed in I-1 via Plan Review <br /> Committee Approval per S. 174-45.7 B.3. (Emphasis added). <br /> "It should likewise be noted: If the applicant were to apply for a Special Permit for the <br /> C-3 zoned section of the lot, the application would go through both Plan Review <br /> Committee and Planning Board approval, including Town Official (inc. Health, Police <br /> and Fire) and Town Engineer review of the plans for important public health and <br /> safety issues like emergency access, a decommissioning plan, a storm water <br /> management plan, a glare study etc. The record and decision should reflect the <br /> applicant's elected approach circumvents these public health and safety controls in <br /> the relevant provisions of the by-law. It may also be worth noting that the 2023 <br /> expansion of Mashpee's Zoning Code to include C-2 and C-3 via Special permit was at <br /> least in part in response to the Tracer II v. Waltham decision the applicant relies <br /> heavily on in its narrative." <br /> "I would also recommend you request the applicant submit documentation as to the <br /> remaining developable land in R-5 since it appears to be hanging its hat on the <br /> percentage argument, i.e. the numbers should expressly carve out land that is <br /> restricted for conservation, open space, is a state or national park or preserve, belongs <br /> to the Tribe etc. The applicant should also include in its submission estimates of the <br /> areas that allow med/large scale ground mounted solar via Special Permit in C-2 and <br /> C-3." <br /> 10 <br />