My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/23/2025 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
04/23/2025 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2025 12:29:33 PM
Creation date
5/19/2025 2:33:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/23/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> APRIL 23, 2025 <br /> Mr. Goldstein, second, yes <br /> Mr. Furbush, yes, <br /> Mr. Ganzenmuller, yes, <br /> Mr. Caggiano, yes. <br /> Ms. Sangeleer, yes. <br /> All were in favor to issue a Special Permit. <br /> 420 Nathan Ellis Hwy: Petitioner, NextGrid Persimmon LLC requests an Appeal of <br /> the Building Commissioner's Decision under M.G.L. Chapter 40A §§8 and 15. <br /> Petitioner disputes the Building Commissioner's determination that medium and <br /> large scale ground mounted solar energy systems in the C-2 Zoning District requires <br /> a Special Permit from the Planning Board subject to §174-45.7 of the Zoning Bylaws, <br /> and not allowed in an R-5 Zoning District, Map 72, Parcel 118, Mashpee, MA. (Owner <br /> of Record: OBRM LLC, Trustee of the Brickyard Road Realty Trust). <br /> Sitting on this hearing are Ms. Sangeleer, Mr. Furbush, Mr. Goldstein, Mr. Milbury <br /> and Mr. Reidy. <br /> Mr. Milbury asked if the Board can hear this petition after reading the Conservation <br /> Agent comment that it requires an application with the Commission. <br /> The Board commented; yes, that it does require a hearing with Concom. <br /> Ms. Sangeleer read the comment submitted by Mr. Morris back in July 2024 that is <br /> noted in the withdrawal decision regarding ground mounted solar projects. Stated: <br /> (Mr. Morris stated that this proposal was (emphasis added) submitted as large scale <br /> ground mounted solar. Small scale ground mounted solar is allowed in an R-5 <br /> residential. It is not allowed on a large scale as was proposed, and should be submitted <br /> separately from the C-2 Zoning District. The C-2 is allowed on a larger scale through <br /> the Planning Board (emphasis added) who is the Special Permit granting authority. A <br /> proposal would be required to be submitted to the Planning Board for the C-2. Mr. Morris <br /> stated that this would be a good use for this area. Mr. Morris stated he would like to <br /> see a small scale solar in the residential area, not a large scale solar. The large scale <br /> solar would be denied. Two separate proposals would be required because there are <br /> two separate zoning districts.)" <br /> Mr. Reidy read the Town Planner comments into the record dated April 23, 2025; <br /> "The application is not complete. I would recommend having the applicant complete all <br /> missing sections. <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.