Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> beach areas. The beach areas are considered publicly accessible state-owned land <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Mr. Cook asked for a motion. Mr. Sahl motioned for a negative determination with condition for <br /> <br /> addition of drywells to capture roof runoff. Ms Godfrey seconded the motion. Mr. Colombo <br /> <br /> <br /> referenced 310 10.02(2)(b)(2) regarding examples of minor projects within the buffer zone to <br /> <br /> wetlands/wetland resource areas. Mr. Colombo does not consider that a RDA is appropriate <br /> <br /> <br /> for this filing and stated project may result in an adverse impact. No additional discussion. <br /> <br /> Voting on the original motion for Negative Determination <br /> <br /> <br /> Mrs. Thornbrugh (NO) <br /> <br /> Ms. Godrey (NO) <br /> <br /> <br /> Mr. Sahl (YES) <br /> <br /> Mr. Colombo (NO), <br /> <br /> <br /> Mr. Cook (YES) <br /> <br /> Motion fails (3-2) <br /> <br /> <br /> Mrs. Pitt inquires about next steps procedurally and additional discussion ensued. Mr. Colombo <br /> <br /> motioned for a positive determination. Ms.Godfrey seconds the motion. No additional discussion <br /> <br /> <br /> Voting on the motion for a Positive Determination <br /> <br /> Mrs. Thornbrugh (YES) <br /> <br /> <br /> Ms. Godrey (YES) <br /> <br /> Mr. Sahl (NO) <br /> <br /> <br /> Mr. Colombo (YES), <br /> <br /> Mr. Cook (NO) <br /> <br /> <br /> Motion passes (3-2). Applicant must file a Notice of Intent <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 67 Whippoorwill Circle, David Carr. Proposed septic system upgrade to Title IV IA system. <br /> <br />RDA (Representative: Engineering Works Inc.) <br /> <br /> <br /> RESOURCE AREAS: LSCSF (AE zone). No other wetlands within 150 ft of project locus <br /> <br /> Anna Warner of Engineering Works described the proposal for a septic upgrade to an IA system. <br /> <br /> <br /> current septic system is in failure. Mrs Thornbrugh referenced a variance request to Board of <br /> <br /> Health for 1 ft increase in groundwater separation. Anna Warner stated that Board of Health <br /> <br /> <br /> approved this variance. Additional discussion ensued. Mrs. Thornbrugh asked about <br /> <br /> applicability of lawn requirements. <br /> <br /> <br /> Anna Warner clarified that 1 holly tree and a few small trees will need to be removed. Mr. <br /> <br /> Colombo clarified about number of bedrooms, which is 4. No increase in flow. Mr. Colombo <br /> <br /> <br /> asked about N loading calcs and additional discussion ensued in N loading. Mr. Cook asked <br /> <br /> about a couple of large pines in the proposed SAS area and is concerned that they may need to <br /> <br /> <br /> be removed. Anna Warner stated she did not anticipate removal of these trees. Mr. Cook stated that <br /> <br /> replacement of any trees removed should be a condition if this is approved. Mr. Colombo expressed concerns <br /> <br /> <br /> about septic tank discharge into groundwater and the variance request to decrease <br /> <br /> separation from groundwater…additional concerns about this being presented as a RDA <br /> <br /> <br /> because it’s in a resource area (LSCSF). Additional discussion ensued <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Mrs Pitt inquired about past precedence for septic upgrades and filings thereof ….additional <br /> <br /> discussion ensued. Agent Kent clarified procedures moving forward with this application. <br /> <br /> <br /> Mr. Sahl asked how the septic is failing and the impacts of existing septic failure moving <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />