Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> FEBRUARY, 26, 2025 <br /> 7. The Board finds under §174-25 (H) (7) and §174-33 that the proposed <br /> storage shed cannot be developed with a principle residential use, provided <br /> there be no commercial use or storage, no sanitary facilities, no storage <br /> outside of buildings, that no structure exceeds fifteen (15) feet in height <br /> and that all applicable setbacks and lot coverage requirements are met <br /> and approved for the use by the Zoning Board of Appeals. <br /> Mr. Blaisdell second. Mr. Bonvie polled the Board. <br /> Mr. Milbury, yes, <br /> Mr. Reidy, yes, <br /> Mr. Blaisdell, yes, <br /> Mr. Bonvie, yes, and <br /> Ms. Sangeleer, no. The application passed with a 4-1 vote. <br /> 9 Running Light Way <br /> Attorney Christopher Kirrane represented the Owners, Stanislav and Irina <br /> Berdichevsky requesting a Modification and Variance to an approved permit <br /> (FINDING-2023-53) under §174-17 of the Zoning Bylaws to allow for an existing <br /> deck to remain on property located in an R-3 Zoning District, Map 111, Parcel <br /> 65, Mashpee, MA. Also present was Ms. Berdichevsky, Owner of the property. <br /> This project was before the Board for an addition to a single-family structure as <br /> a Written Finding. The Board approved the Finding and one of the conditions <br /> was that the deck be removed, and that a patio be installed in place of the deck <br /> to offset the lot coverage percentage requirement. The Owner wrote a letter to the <br /> Building Commissioner requesting to keep the deck to accommodate her ailing <br /> parents. That letter was submitted to the Board and is part of the narrative in <br /> the application. Attorney Kirrane said that allowing the deck to remain will <br /> exceed the lot coverage but he believes it is a reasonable request in this particular <br /> case. <br /> Attorney Kirrane stated that the reason for the Modification request is that one <br /> of the conditions of the Written Finding requires the applicant to return to the <br /> Board. The Variance request is because by leaving the deck to remain will exceed <br /> the lot coverage. <br /> 9 <br />