Laserfiche WebLink
Town of Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> He emphasized that the internal culvert was originally installed to manage water levels for active cranberry <br /> farming, which would have been exempt under the agricultural provisions of the Wetlands Protection Act at that <br /> time. Now that cranberry operations have ceased, the site is no longer agriculturally exempt and is regulated as a <br /> wetland. Obstructing the culvert to artificially impound water therefore constitutes an unauthorized alteration and a <br /> violation of the Wetlands Protection Act. In addition, the project's restoration consultant has advised that accurate <br /> evaluation of habitat conditions and restoration options for the upstream bog cell requires that it be allowed to drain, <br /> at least temporarily, so that the former brook channel and bog surface can be properly assessed in non-flooded <br /> conditions. <br /> It was noted that the ownership pattern is complex. Properties on the Mashpee side are largely association- <br /> owned,while buffer areas on the Falmouth side are privately owned. The Town and project partners are actively <br /> working on land acquisition and long-term restoration planning. Because of this ongoing relationship-building, staff <br /> recommended a careful, low-key approach to enforcement and corrective action. Mr. McManus proposed <br /> contacting the president of the Seabrook Village Association on the Mashpee side, with whom he has had <br /> constructive communication,to explain that the culvert blockage is a violation that cannot remain in place and that <br /> the Town intends to remove the boards, clamps, and stone to restore flow and enable proper assessment of <br /> restoration options. He stressed that this would be presented as an informational notice of necessary corrective <br /> action rather than a request for permission, while still maintaining transparency and respecting the Association's <br /> role as a key stakeholder. Commissioners supported this approach and acknowledged that, in light of both public <br /> safety concerns related to the failed road culvert and the long-term goal of restoring Red Brook and associated <br /> wetlands, the culvert obstruction must ultimately be removed. <br /> • Upper Quashnet Restoration <br /> Next was a brief update on the Upper Quashnet River restoration project. The consulting firm is nearing completion <br /> of 50% design plans for the next phase of restoration. Once those plans are ready, the consultant will schedule a <br /> meeting with the Commission to present the design, receive feedback, and take public comments, similar to the <br /> process followed at the 25% design milestone. Commissioners will be provided materials in advance to allow for <br /> review and questions at that session. <br /> • Johns Pond and Santuit Pond Milfoil <br /> Mr. McManus received the year-end report for the John's Pond milfoil management project from Water& <br /> Wetlands,the Town's consultant. It was reported that the results are very positive: there is currently no visible <br /> evidence of milfoil within the treatment area. He reminded the Commission that the original infestation covered <br /> roughly 4.5 acres, concentrated primarily in the southern portion of the pond near the lagoon, and that a <br /> reinfestation or reintroduction occurred after the initial control efforts. A draft of the next treatment plan has been <br /> provided to Town Counsel, who has returned comments that staff are now incorporating. Based on that feedback <br /> and the recommendations, the Town is targeting early to mid-spring, likely late March, or early April—for the next <br /> round of treatment, as that period is considered the most effective time of year for managing aquatic invasive <br /> species such as milfoil. <br /> • Chop Chaque Bog Restoration <br /> Mr. McManus provided an update on the Chop Chaque Bog restoration project and noted one unanticipated but not <br /> necessarily negative development: the surface water on the site has not receded as quickly as originally expected in <br /> the restoration plan. As a result, wetland succession is occurring more slowly than projected. He clarified that this is <br /> only a"problem"in relation to the timeline envisioned in the plan; from an ecological standpoint, the extended <br /> 9 <br />