01/22/2026 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Town of Mashpee Conservation Commission 16 Great Neck Road North Mashpee, MA 02649 (This space is reserved for topics that the Chairman did not reasonably anticipate would be discussed). None discussed. *NOTE: INDIVIDUAL HEARINGS WILL BE LIMITED TO 15 MINUTES IN LENGTH (More complex proposals may be granted additional time, if necessary,by the Chair) RDA 231 Monomoscoy Road, Richard T. Jackmauh Trustee. Proposed replacement of existing retaining wall, walkway, driveway, and steps. (Representative: Outerland) The applicant requested a continuance before substantive review. Staff explained that the request for continuance was necessary because a portion of the retaining wall proposed for reconstruction extends into the road shoulder, and Monomoscoy Road is a Town-owned roadway. As a result, part of the proposed work would occur outside the subject property boundary. The applicant was advised that the Conservation Commission cannot review or approve work on land not owned by the applicant without documented authorization from the landowner. In this case, that authorization would need to come from the Town of Mashpee, likely through the Department of Public Works (DPW). Staff noted that this issue was initially identified during discussions with the Zoning Board of Appeals, prompting the applicant to pause the Conservation review. The applicant's consultant indicated they will coordinate with DPW and the appropriate Town departments to clarify ownership, obtain any required permissions, and resolve the roadway encroachment issue before returning to the Commission. No substantive review of the environmental aspects of the project occurred at this hearing. The Commission accepted the request to continue the RDA to February 5, 2026, to allow time for the applicant to resolve the off- property work issue and return with a complete and reviewable application. MOTION: To accept the request to continue the application for 231 Monomoscoy Road to February 5, 2026. Motion by: Sandi Godfrey Seconded by: Richard Sahl Vote: Motion passed by unanimous vote. (Sarah Thornbrugh, Paul Colombo, Sandi Godfrey, Seana Pitt, Richard Sahl) NOI 49 The Heights. Jan & Pamela Aggerbeck, Aggerbeck Living Trust. Proposed pool 43- Installation and mitigation. (Representative: Homestead Consulting Engineers)(Cont.12.11 i 1.08) 3381 The Commission reopened the continued public hearing for 49 The Heights. The applicant's representative, Josh Green of Homestead Consulting Engineers,presented revisions made in response to concerns raised at the prior hearings. --------------------------------------------------- Revised Pool Layout and Inland Bank Considerations Mr. Green explained that an alternative pool orientation was evaluated, including rotating the pool farther from the deck to address safety concerns. However, that configuration resulted in the pool structure moving closer to the inland bank, increasing the potential impact to the bank due to excavation. The applicant concluded that maintaining the original layout, with the pool farther from the inland bank and closer to the deck, was less detrimental to the interests of the inland bank than relocating excavation closer to the slope. Permeable Patio and Groundwater Recharge 3