My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/27/2026 COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT COMMITTEE Minutes
>
01/27/2026 COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2026 5:00:15 PM
Creation date
3/26/2026 2:49:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/27/2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Town of Mashpee Community Preservation Committee <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> >iz Mashpee,MA 02649 <br /> recommendation should be contingent on that designation.A historic preservation restriction would also <br /> be required and would generally protect exterior features only. <br /> Members discussed limiting funding to exterior work and whether partial funding reduces legal risk. <br /> Counsel advised that the key issue is whether the funding supports preservation of a historic resource <br /> rather than church operations. The need for clearer cost information, oversight, and compliance with <br /> historic standards was noted. <br /> 701 Great Neck Road South <br /> Counsel advised that while there is no religious issue with this application, it raises concerns about using <br /> public funds for private property with little or no public access. Even a 50%public contribution <br /> represents a significant use of CPA funds and requires a clear showing of historic, architectural, or <br /> cultural importance to the town. Counsel cautioned that interior work, office space, or additional <br /> dwelling units primarily benefit the owner and are difficult to justify under CPA.A preservation <br /> restriction would protect only the exterior, meaning the interior could later be altered despite public <br /> investment. Counsel emphasized that Town Meeting has final authority to approve either project,but <br /> both carry legal risk.Any ten taxpayers may challenge the use of funds before they are spent or <br /> contractually committed. Counsel's role was to outline the risks and considerations; the final decision <br /> rests with the Committee and Town Meeting. <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> KC COOMBS PLAYGROUND <br /> Catherine Laurent, DPW Director, presented a time-sensitive request to replace the therapeutic <br /> preschool playground surface at the K.C. Coombs School. The request came outside the normal <br /> CPC cycle after safety concerns surfaced at the start of the school year. The project was first <br /> submitted to the Capital Improvement Committee, which suggested that CPC consider it for the <br /> May Town Meeting. The playground was originally funded in part by CPC in 2014, with additional <br /> support from the PTO and Kiwanis. It is used daily by preschool students and is open to the public <br /> after school hours. The poured-in-place rubber surface has broken down beyond its expected <br /> lifespan, despite recent repairs, creating choking and fall hazards for young children. Several recent <br /> injuries made the need for replacement more urgent. <br /> DPW recommended replacing the surface with interlocking rubber tiles rather than another poured <br /> surface. The tile system allows individual sections to be replaced as needed, requires less <br /> maintenance, includes a limited lifetime warranty, is made from recycled materials, and contains no <br /> PFAS. DPW would handle demolition in-house, with installation by a contractor taking a little over <br /> a week. If approved, the work would be done during summer recess so the playground is ready for <br /> the next school year. The total project cost is about$150,000, with $135,000 requested from CPC <br /> and the balance coming from other sources. The project is outside flood zones,has no conservation <br /> impacts, and, as a capital project over$25,000, cannot be paid for through a school operating <br /> budget. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.