My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/07/2026 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
05/07/2026 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2026 5:00:46 PM
Creation date
6/15/2026 10:53:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/07/2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br /> Town of Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> NOI 61 & 67 Shoestring Bay Road, 61 Shoestring Bay Road, LLC c/o Glenn Ferguson <br /> & Willowbend Country Club Inc. Proposed boardwalk. (Representative: Cape & Islands <br /> Engineering, Inc.) (cont. 4.2/4.23) 43- <br /> 3406 <br /> A request was made to continue the hearing to May 21, 2026. It was stated that the continuance had been requested due <br /> to extensive discussion at the prior hearing regarding the related vista application. The applicant sought additional time <br /> to incorporate the Commission's decision on that matter into the boardwalk plans. It was further stated that, because the <br /> related application had now been approved,the revised plans would reflect that decision moving forward. <br /> MOTION: To continue the hearing for 61 & 67 Shoestring Bay Road to May 21, 2026. <br /> Motion b Sandi Godfrey Seconded bv: Seana Pitt <br /> Vote: Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. <br /> Steve Cook,Paul Colombo, Sandi Godfrey, Seana Pitt <br /> NOI 17 Sunset Circle, Eric L. Coelho. Proposed removal of the existing timber wall and replacement <br /> with a new vinyl sheet pile wall, permit the existing pier, and install native vegetation plantings. <br /> (Representative: Cape and Islands Engineering, Inc.) (cont. 4.23) 43- <br /> 3414 <br /> The Commission continued review of a Notice of Intent for 17 Sunset Circle regarding the proposed removal <br /> of an existing timber retaining wall and replacement with a new vinyl sheet pile wall, permitting of an existing <br /> pier, and installation of native vegetation plantings, represented by Cape and Islands Engineering. The <br /> applicant's representative stated that the property abuts John's Pond and currently contains an existing timber <br /> retaining wall composed of vertical timber posts proposed for replacement. The project was described as <br /> including construction of a new approximately 60-foot-long vinyl sheet pile wall with tieback rods and <br /> deadman, installation of drainage features to relieve hydrostatic pressure, restoration of grades following <br /> construction, installation of approximately 175 square feet of native plantings, and permitting of the existing <br /> pier operating under an interim Chapter 91 license. It was further stated that all work would occur within <br /> previously disturbed areas and that erosion controls including silt fence and straw waddles would be installed <br /> during construction. <br /> Discussion addressed comments received from Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program staff <br /> regarding shellfish monitoring requirements associated with the project. It was stated that a biologist would <br /> likely be required to inspect the work area for shellfish prior to construction activities, and the applicant's <br /> representative stated willingness to comply with all recommended conditions. Commissioners also requested <br /> additional information regarding the size and type of boats proposed to utilize the pier, noting that dock <br /> regulations require such information regardless of whether the dock is located in freshwater or saltwater. <br /> Additional discussion focused on the existing pier configuration and whether the length and seasonality of the <br /> dock were appropriate. Concerns were raised regarding the need for the pier to extend approximately 50 feet <br /> into John's Pond given the available water depths closer to shore. Questions were also raised regarding <br /> discrepancies between the narrative and plans concerning whether the dock would remain seasonal or <br /> permanent. It was stated that the final determination regarding seasonality may depend on recommendations <br /> from state agencies and Natural Heritage review. Discussion further addressed the potential effects of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.