Laserfiche WebLink
Town of Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> John's Pond had not undergone a diagnostic study in many years, and Moody Pond had never received such a <br /> study. Discussion also noted the close relationship between the two ponds and their historical hydrologic <br /> connection. It was further stated that a draft support letter could be prepared for Chair signature and submitted to <br /> the Community Preservation Committee as part of the application materials.No opposition to the request was <br /> expressed by Commission members. <br /> Updates: <br /> None of the topics below were discussed: <br /> • Red Brook Road Culvert(Waquoit Bay Research Reserve-grant assistance) <br /> • Upper Quashnet Restoration <br /> • Johns Pond and Santuit Pond Milfoil <br /> • Chop Chaque Bog Restoration <br /> • Local Comprehensive Plan <br /> • Herring Warden <br /> • Harbor Management Committee <br /> • Mashpee River Restoration <br /> • Santuit Pond Fish Ladder—NRCS <br /> • Guided Nature Tours—May Schedule <br /> • Poppy Spit Dredge <br /> Communication/Correspondence: (public comment solicited for each update) <br /> None discussed. <br /> Additional Topics: <br /> (Any topics not on the approved agenda must be voted on andplaced on the next hearing or quarterly agenda). <br /> Mr. Kent stated that an unpermitted dock had been identified in Shoe String Bay near Quiniquissett Avenue and <br /> that the matter was under review. Additional discussion addressed storm debris consisting of tree branches that had <br /> reportedly been pushed onto riprap areas along the roadside following a recent storm event. It was stated that the <br /> situation involving the branches was still being investigated. It was further stated that the dock would be removed. <br /> Ms. Pitt referenced statements made by former Vice Chair Sarah Thornbrugh during a recent Select Board meeting <br /> concerning her resignation from the Commission. It was stated that Ms. Thornbrugh had raised concerns regarding <br /> whether the Commission was operating both legally and morally. Ms. Pitt stated that the Commission should place <br /> the matter on a future agenda for discussion and evaluation. Discussion followed regarding timing of such a <br /> discussion, including reference to potential consultation between the Town Manager and legal counsel. It was <br /> stated that the matter should not be delayed until the Commission's quarterly meeting given the nature of the <br /> concerns raised. It was further clarified that Ms. Thornbrugh had presented her comments verbally before the <br /> Select Board and that the written correspondence had been directed to the Select Board rather than the <br /> Conservation Commission. <br /> 2 <br />