Laserfiche WebLink
of TMs s,s <br /> z. <br /> Aannin Board <br /> c� <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> .wlashpee, Aassachusetts 02649 <br /> MOTION: <br /> Dennis Balzarini made a motion to continue the Public Hearing to August 19, 2026 <br /> at 6:40PM. Seconded by Rob Hansen. All in favor. <br /> 7:45PM Local Comprehensive Plan (LCP) <br /> July 2026 version of the Local Comprehensive Plan (LCP)for the Town of Mashpee will be <br /> voted on by the Planning Board at a dually noticed Public Hearing at the Mashpee Town Hall, <br /> Waquoit Meeting Room, 16 Great Neck Road North, Mashpee, MA 02649, at 7:45PM on July <br /> 1, 2026. <br /> Ms. Waygan read the Public Hearing notice into the record. <br /> The Town Planner, Brian Tobin, congratulated the Board, the public, and the Department for all <br /> the hard work on this journey, organization, attention to detail, and overall, a great job. The <br /> most recent updated version corrected formatting errors, and some of the largest changes <br /> were additions to the appendix. This included survey summaries for themes of the plan, a prior <br /> Heritage Preservation Chapter from the 1998 LCP, comments this Board deliberated on about <br /> the Growth Policy statement, and just making sure everything flowed nicely with factual <br /> accuracy. <br /> Ms. Waygan noted there were some comments about the housing organizations and asked if <br /> those were added. <br /> Mr. Tobin continued that it was important for this Board to be aware that Lynne Barbee did <br /> submit suggested changes that he made departmentally, as they do not involve policy and <br /> therefore would not implicate the Board. Instead, the changes purely involve factual accuracy, <br /> regarding the role of the Mashpee Housing Authority and also the chart of properties under <br /> their purview. <br /> Ms. Waygan did have one comment about reviewing the Flow Neutral Bylaw and the Tree <br /> Preservation Bylaw as needed and asked if that was input. <br /> Mr. Tobin did not add that because, 1) it speaks to policy and should have been discussed at a <br /> public meeting among Board members, and 2) the request was located far down in her e-mail <br /> 9 <br />