My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/06/2026 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
08/06/2026 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2026 5:00:35 PM
Creation date
9/8/2026 11:32:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/06/2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Town of Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> NOI 190 Monomoscoy Road,Kevin Cayer. Proposed new single-family dwelling with <br /> mitigation plantings. (Representative: Cape & Islands Engineering, Inc.) <br /> (cont. 11.23 /2.05 /3.05 /3.19/ 5.07) 43- <br /> 3258 <br /> Representatives from Cape & Islands Engineering, Inc. appeared on behalf of the applicant, Kevin Cayer, <br /> regarding the proposed construction of a new single-family dwelling with mitigation plantings at 190 <br /> Monomoscoy Road. Mr. Cayer was also present. The applicant's representative noted that although the matter had <br /> been continued several times, this was the third substantive presentation, with prior continuances allowing time for <br /> requested documents and revisions. <br /> The revised design reduced the size of the house and relocated it outside the 50-foot buffer to bordering vegetated <br /> wetlands and the 75-foot buffer to the ACEC. The house was revised to be supported on piers, and the septic <br /> design was changed from the previously proposed MicroFAST system to a best available nitrogen-reducing <br /> technology. The previously proposed retaining walls for the septic system and driveway were eliminated, and a <br /> dewatering basin was added to the plans in the event dewatering became necessary. <br /> The landscaping plan was expanded to include native plantings throughout most of the property,with <br /> approximately 900 square feet of lawn primarily over the septic system. Disturbed areas within the Town road <br /> layout would be restored with native species. Roof runoff would be managed through drywells, and a crushed- <br /> stone driveway was proposed. Although the property is within an AE flood zone rather than a velocity zone, the <br /> applicant agreed at the Commission's request to construct the house on piers as though it were within a velocity <br /> zone and increased the first-floor elevation to 14.5. <br /> Mr. Colombo questioned the nitrogen calculations for the revised septic system, noting the difference between the <br /> system's approximately 19-milligram-per-liter effluent concentration and the overall site calculation of <br /> approximately 7.343 milligrams per liter. The applicant explained that the required calculation evaluates the <br /> property as a whole and that the MassDEP-approved concentration for the proposed system is approximately 19 <br /> milligrams per liter, compared with approximately 35 milligrams per liter for a conventional Title 5 system. Mr. <br /> Colombo also asked whether the two groundwater monitoring wells installed in March had been checked again. <br /> The applicant stated that no additional readings had been taken because efforts had focused on revisions requested <br /> by the Commission, but that the wells could remain and additional monitoring could be performed. <br /> Ms. Pitt asked about groundwater flow. The applicant stated that monitoring-well measurements indicated flow <br /> from Great River toward Little River, although conditions farther inland could differ. Ms. Pitt acknowledged that <br /> the house had been relocated outside the buffer but remained concerned about installation of a new septic system <br /> within a buffer zone. The applicant noted that the proposed system would include nitrogen-reducing technology <br /> and UV treatment for pathogens and viruses. <br /> Mr. Sahl questioned how the various site components factored into the overall nitrogen calculation. The applicant <br /> explained that the approximately 7.343-milligram-per-liter calculation accounted for manageable nitrogen sources <br /> associated with the site and did not include naturally occurring nitrogen. <br /> The Commission reviewed erosion controls, native plantings, the crushed-stone walking path, limited lawn area <br /> and proposed pier foundation. Mr. Colombo asked what would be located beneath the elevated house. The <br /> applicant stated that no concrete slab was proposed and that the area would remain permeable, likely using crushed <br /> stone or similar material. The applicant agreed that a condition could prohibit a concrete or impervious slab <br /> beneath the house. <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.