Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES January 26, 1995 5 BOARD OF HEALTH <br /> Mr. Doherty questioned, "Isn't that Weston & Sampson's responsibility?" <br /> Mr. McQuaid responded, "Yes, they are aware of it." "Weston & Sampson and <br /> John DiGorgio from Town Counsel's office will attend the meeting." <br /> Acknowledged. <br /> *****NEW BUSINESS***** <br /> Landfill Capping Grant Program- Worcester <br /> Mr. McQuaid relayed, "We were notified at the meeting in Worcester that we will <br /> be definitely receiving $350,000.00 to help defray the costs of capping the landfill." "If <br /> we agree to accept the grant under the present circumstances they will want us to start <br /> closure construction of our landfill within 1 year of signing the agreement to accept the <br /> grant." "Weston & Sampson and I are working on applying for that grant to reimburse <br /> what we have already spent on capping the existing portion of the landfill so that we don't <br /> have to sign on a one year beginning date." "I think we will succeed in that so then we <br /> can live with the timetable of 1997." <br /> Mr. Ball questioned whether we spend over the $50,000.00. <br /> Mr. Doherty responded, "Yes, additionally we spoke with Executive Secretary <br /> who is agreeable to setting up a special account so that funds remains available for <br /> capping the landfill." <br /> Mr. Doherty questioned whether Weston & Sampson have any liability if they fail <br /> to adhere to the monitoring schedule. <br /> Mr. McQuaid responded, "They are under contract with us to provide the <br /> necessary services to comply with the D.E.P. requirements as far as landfill monitoring <br /> goes however, if does become a little muddy if you consider the fact that the Barnstable <br /> County Health Department agreed to perform some of the sampling and some of the <br /> analysis at no expense to the town." "That took some of responsibility away from Weston <br /> & Sampson so it is unclear where the responsibility lies." "In my opinion the monitoring <br /> and sampling of the groundwater monitoring wells has been adequate over the past six or <br /> seven years." "We may not have done it twice a year every year but we have been close <br /> to that and the trend shows that the groundwater contamination has steadily been going <br /> down to the point where now we feel the slug has passed." "The last set of sampling for <br /> 24 wells only showed one hit." <br />