2006-DESIGN REVIEW - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

759 Falmouth Road Directory Sign, Clover Courtyard Locust Street Signs Michael McGowan of Locust Street Sign Co. showed photo of site and proposed sign. Design Review advised that he needs to show a site plan showing where the directory sign is going and it has to be 5 feet inside the property line. The proposed sign was 50 square feet, but only allowed 20 square feet. Conclusion: Not approved. Needs site plan showing where directory sign being placed, including landscape plan and proposed lighting, if any, and must conform to each law. Site Plan and Landscape Review Stephen Giatrelis 70 Nicoletta's Way Contractor Space—Storage/Warehouse/Industrial Space John Slavinsky, Cape &Islands Engineering, showed site plan and said they went to Tech Review. Design Review Committee reviewed the site plan and said it looks great the way the two buildings were broken up. John explained that 10 additional spruce will be on left side of the property at the entrance and existing spruce will remain on the right side of the entranceway: Site plan was reviewed and discussed: • No sidewalks; lot paved. • Trees are in buffers and will stay. • Handicap parking is okay. • Issue: Design Review recommended increasing buffer on south side at ballpark by 20 feet to increase buffer at that side to 30 feet. John indicated no problem; will move buildings closer together which will workout better. • Mary suggested to plant native-type plantings since no irrigation. Conclusion: Not approved. Needs to submit revised Plan and also Building Plan. May want to show signage location and site lighting on submitted plan. Duck Pond Limited Partnership 106 Falmouth Road Self-Storage Building, contractor, storage and business incubator/light industrial/office/lab or research space Edwin Taipale,Daniel Ojala(project engineer), and Stuart Bornstein appeared. Design Review Committee reminded the applicant that plans should be submitted at least 7 days prior to review meeting and that Mary did not get the Landscape PIan until yesterday afternoon. Daniel Ojala explained changes that were made to the site plans and that they picked up some ideas from the Planning Board meeting. Following are issues/comments from review discussion: • Mr. Bornstein said they want to do what's right and they have 2 governing bodies telling them what to do. He said$7 Million being put into the project and they want to be right. • Design Review pointed out that applicant commented that what they're proposing is what Cape Cod Commission approved,but on further review it is not what Cape Cod Commission approved. • On Plan Commission approved height of buildings was 21 feet; proposed buildings here are 35 feet. • Walter stressed that they cannot come and.say Commission approved plans, when it is not the plan approved by the Commission. • Three times they've appeared for review; 3 new plans submitted. • Daniel said height is only change,but admitted that is a big change.