My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/9/1980 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
1/9/1980 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2018 4:04:10 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 2:45:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/09/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-9- <br /> Charlesc Yes, as a practical matter. <br /> Pauline: Are you just taking the whole thing as one unit because there is marsh in <br /> there over 500 feet in. <br /> Charles: The marsh in that area would be protected through the Wetlands as well. So <br /> that where there are marsh and it would be in here somewhere (pointing to map). you <br /> are already coming back from the river to start from the edge of the Wetlands. It <br /> would automatically protect further back in. I just think of this thing as practical <br /> that there is no sense in us as a conservation commission saying we have to have this <br /> or we have to have that. It is ultimately the people who own that property who are <br /> going to sink any proposition that is put across or allow it to swim. <br /> Barbara: But isn't it up to us to give them some guidance? <br /> Charles: You can't guide somebody into givingaway property unless he wants to. This <br /> is their view. <br /> Pauline: The greater part of that area is not built upon, Charlie. Pirate's Cove is <br /> built on. (Pointing to map) There are a few houses scattered up through here. From <br /> Route 28 down, there is nothing. That is all marsh in through here. These were bogs <br /> that were let go up in here. To let them go back to a natural state. <br /> Charlesc I just think that no matter what you propose you are not going to get it <br /> through if you are going for a limit of 50 feet back from the banking. Just as a matter <br /> of practicality. We have been battling this thing for two years. <br /> Pauline: Now you are saying 50 feet, which is less than the state statute of 100 feet. <br /> Dorothyv He is talking---about establishing a district by either a by-law or zoning. <br /> Charles:- The Planning Board could do -it. But if you-ask for more than_50 -feet,. I don't <br /> think that youaregoingto get the vote toacceptthe by-law, <br /> Dick- Terry:- Well, that may be but I am just trying -to pick but-your sense-in-terms of <br /> just going along with anything And when we= talk about the number- of- feet-;=let -us move-on - <br /> to that - <br /> Chariest Is there anything else that -you could do' outside. of:that?.__ Short- of. buying- up _ <br /> the property Along there, <br /> Pauline: Well, Pemberton Whitcomb donated-19 to 20 acres along the edge.- <br /> Charlest I thought when the trustees and reservations .were at that one meeting they in- <br /> dicated that it was -up here on this bank,. <br /> Pauline: Oh, trustees own that any how.=. <br /> Charles: This was additional to that. This was what they got from Whitcomb. <br /> Pauline: 20 acres? <br /> Charles: It is a long narrow strip. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.