Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br /> till McKay: Asks for an explanation on the provision of a dock. <br /> Dick Terry: Basically the provision is that no structure of any kind may be located <br /> in the area subject to the by-law. It is felt by the board that no one is trying to <br /> hurt anyone's boating interests and recreation is really part of the conservation ef- <br /> forts as well. <br /> Pauline: May I ask why you do not go for more than 100 feet when the Mashpee River <br /> Corridor is asking for 100 yards? <br /> Dick Terry: It was thought that 100 feet would be something that people could live with. <br /> It could have been more, but we felt that 100 feet was not too burdensome on anyone and <br /> that it made some sense. We felt that was reasonable. <br /> Mr. Marsters: We feel that in some cases it could eliminate some people's property <br /> entirely. <br /> Paulinet I was going to ask that -- that has all been laid out. <br /> Mr. Marsters: There were several cases where it would eliminate their parcel entirely. <br /> Pauline: Could they go for a variance? <br /> Mr. Marsters: Yes, they could go for a variance. <br /> Wayne: Are you trying to accommodate this by-law prior to New Seabury. For example, as <br /> a land owner prior to their setting their plans together so that any lots will not be <br /> adjacent to the stream. <br /> Dick Terry: Everything will be subject to this within the area of the by-law. <br /> Mr. Marsters: The lots can go to the river as they do now but there will be the same ef- <br /> fect as an easement. <br /> Wayne: Then each dock would be an individual dock? <br /> Dick Terry: We have nothing in mind. <br /> Hen: Suggests that it is written in that people must have a mooring if this is supposed <br /> to be a scenic river. <br /> Dick: Had no answer on this. It was just felt there should be a concern for recreation. <br /> Mr. Marsters: Anyone seeking a dock permit has to be before the State. <br /> Barbara: That would be our function. <br /> Mr. Marsters: I think that only a small amount of the river would be subject to docks -- <br /> conservation will have control of it. <br /> Bill McKay: On the other side of Pirates Coves there is probably 30 acres. Would you <br /> consider including that? I would like to see that included -- all that land opposite <br /> Pirates Cove -- much of it is unbuilt upon. <br />