Laserfiche WebLink
ti <br /> 4 <br /> Capital hnprovement program.Committee <br /> Minutes <br /> January 28, 2016 <br /> Sewer-$2,8501000. <br /> `ons Fudala, Town planner and Sewer Commissioner reviewed the funding plan <br /> proposed for the implementation of the wastewater facilities; design and construction for <br /> Phase 1 (2017-2021) as per the final Comprehensive wastewater and watershed <br /> Nitrogen Management plan. The Plan is designed in a 5-year phased program to bring <br /> forth a total budget projection of$37.4 rnilllon. The budget as outlined does not include <br /> the shellfish aquaculture component of the plan projected to save nullions in overall <br /> wastewater costs. The success of the shellfish propagation program in reducing nitrogen <br /> levels is intended to be reviewed at the end of each phase which may result in a <br /> revision/re-balance of the work proposed for subsequent phases in the wastewater plan. <br /> First year cost estimates proposed in FYI for a projected $2.85 million in professional <br /> services include $600,000 for a process mechanical preliminary design of the proposed <br /> wastewater treatment plan adjacent to the Transfer Station, $100,000 for a second <br /> consultant value engineering review of the design at 0%, and $2,150,000 for the <br /> treatment plant site design,borings, sees and the identification of the pump station <br /> locations for the first phase collection system. <br /> An in-depth discussion followed with respect to affordability and sustainability. <br /> In reviewing long term costs, the Finance Director related concern regarding the funding <br /> of this project including operational costs, and how this prod ectrould fit wi thin the levy. <br /> In considering projected revenues,the tax rate and growth,this project is not sustainable.. <br /> Selectmen representative Gottlieb indicated there has been no discussion of cost recovery <br /> through rates and fees,the levy, and in betterment assessments. On the state level,there <br /> is the potential for subsidiary. This includes 0% State Revolving Fund loan provision, <br /> and forgiveness for up to 25%of the loan.. All of the options should be considered to <br /> develop a rationale determination regarding this capital expenditure, <br /> Mr. Collins related concern that there is no funding mechanism in the CIF in place for a <br /> project of this magnitude. Although the sewer project has been in the capital prograrn for <br /> a number of years,the Town Manager indicated the funding mechanism for the sewer <br /> program should not derive from the CIP program.. The CIP Committee agreed and Mr. <br /> Fudala did as well. <br /> It was fully determined this matter should fall under the purview of the Town Manager <br /> and Board of Selectmen as this is the single largest project the town will undertake, <br />