Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />MEETING MINUTES <br />AUGUST 23, 2017 <br />Attorney Kevin Kirrane represented the homeowners for their raze and replace project. Also present <br />was Tom Bunker with BSS Design, and Rob Bramhal, Architect. Mr. Kirrane provided the Board <br />with site and architectural plans. Mr. Kirrane said that the revised site plan was issued after having <br />a conversation with Board of Health depicting a 5 bedroom home instead of the original plan <br />depicting a 6 bedroom home. The denitrification system that was shown on the septic plans is now <br />a typical Title V system. <br />Attorney Kirrane said that the lot is 61,000 square feet and has 180 ft, of frontage along Shore <br />Drive. Given this criteria the lot itself conforms to the current zoning requirements in that section <br />of Town. The property has been improved with a single-family four bedroom dwelling, and the <br />elevations on the plan show that it slopes from front to back, and is bounded in the rear by <br />Popponesset Creek. In addition to the dwelling that is on the lot, there is a 3 -car garage and an <br />accessory dock complex. <br />The existing dwelling conforms in all respects to current setback requirements as it relates to side <br />yard, front yard and rear yard. It does not conform to the 50 ft. setback from wetlands resource <br />areas. The lot sits 34 ft. from the boarder of vegetative wetlands {BVW} line, and that is the non- <br />conforming condition on site. The side yards have 45 ft, on both sides, and are well over 150 ft. <br />from the front to the existing dwelling. The garage conforms to current zoning so there is no request <br />for relief, and also well below the 20% lot coverage criteria because of the substantial size of the <br />lot. <br />The non -conformity of the existing structure under §174-33 of the bylaws require a 50 ft. setback <br />from the wetland resource areas, and §174-17 allows alterations or changes to pre-existing non- <br />conforming structures provided that the Board makes a determination that what is being proposed <br />is not substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than what currently exists. Also that there <br />is adequate parking onsite, and that the setbacks that the Board may require are provided. The <br />revised plan now shows a 5 bedroom home as opposed to a 6 bedroom home, and the setback from <br />the BVW changed from 34 ft. to 38 ft., so the only non -conforming condition on the site is now <br />being improved. The project was approved by the Conservation Commission with some mitigation <br />planting. He respectfully asked the Board for approval. <br />The Board requested that Tom Bunker sign and date the revised Layout and Mitigation site plan.. <br />The garage is unheated. <br />Board Member Scott Goldstein wanted to confirm the size of the widow's walk. Mr. Bramhal <br />confirmed that the size is 8 x 14 which is 112 sq. ft. and the height of the proposed structure is 35 <br />ft. The Board told the applicant that the bylaw only allows 100 sq. ft. for the widow's walk, so the <br />plan should be revised. <br />Board Member Bill Blaisdell read the Board of Health comments into the record. Chairman <br />Furbush read the Conservation and Inspection Department comments. <br />Mr. Kirrane explained to the Board that he is not seeking variance relief from § 174-33 because <br />there is already a non -conforming 34 ft. setback from the wetland area, and under § 174-17 to alter <br />a change to non -conforming structures, provided that the Board makes the appropriate finding, and <br />in this case the building is becoming less non -conforming because it will be 38 ft. from the <br />wetlands, and as such he does not believe that as suggested by the Building Commissioner he would <br />require any additional relief under that particular section. <br />0J <br />