Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Assessors Meeting Page <br /> Dearing on. Appeal for Real . ropertr 'fax Abatement <br /> Ma2 128 , Block 2 , Unit 670 - Owner Edward shore continued <br /> assessment date of January 1 , 1993 and two years after the sales <br /> that The Board would have been reviewing. It is not fair to the <br /> other 12 ,000 homeowners in Mashpee who do not have the <br /> opportunity to consider such recent sales as comparisons when <br /> appealing for abatements. what is encouraging is the fact that <br /> the assessment on the subject property 'is not going to last <br /> forever. The major problem is that all of the properties out on <br /> the bluff were dramatically underassessed from the early 1980s <br /> through the very early 1990s compared to the other properties in <br /> the condominium development - that is why assessments on these <br /> particular properties have practically doubled. Discussion <br /> followed. <br /> Chairman Greig explained that specific sales information is <br /> important, not generalities. He agrees with Mr. Bailey that the <br /> subject property and those -in the area were underassessed. . He <br /> explained that in 1990 , Assessing had over 2 , 600 abatement <br /> applications - showing how unrealistic the revaluation was in <br /> that year - previous to David Bailey' s inception and this New <br /> Board of Assessors ' inception. This year, Assessing has only 170 <br /> abatement applications - an excellent indication that the New <br /> Board of Assessors and the New Appraisal Methods must be working <br /> to great advantage. <br /> David Bailey informed that Assessing spent a great deal of <br /> time on the ten properties in the subject area - inspecting, <br /> measuring, etc. Both he and The Board are quite familiar with <br /> circumstances in that area. He informed Mr. Shore that, however, <br />' there is a further appeal to Assessing ' s decision. He explained <br /> that if Mr. shore sincerely believes he has been done an <br /> injustice based on the valuation, Mr. Shore could file an <br /> abatement application ; the Board will have to deny it because It <br /> has no jurisdiction to act on it; then Mr. shore could take that <br /> decision to the State Appellate Tax Board so It could decide <br /> whether Assessing made the right decision on jurisdiction, o <br /> which Mr. Bailey is confident. <br /> Chairman Greig stated that he understands why Mr. Shore is <br /> irate and exasperated. Be recommended that Mr, Shore file a <br /> timely abatement application next year, but that he first <br /> straighten out his tax payment problem with Ms. Shaw. Mr. Shore <br /> again expressed agreement. David Bailey again stated that he <br /> will try tomorrow to obtain from Ms, Shaw the proper information <br /> on Mr . shore ' s account. Upon Chairman reig ' s suggestion, Mir. <br /> Bailey gave Mr. shote some abatement applications, but asked that <br /> Mr. shore not file until he receives or obtains his next tax bill <br /> he may be surprised . the value has dropped. <br />