Laserfiche WebLink
type hone. In the first phase, structures would feature a 7%pitch 'incorporating commercial <br /> properties at the first level/foundation. Further from downtown, the buildings would become <br /> more modest and less formal. Regarding the timeline,Mr. Connell stated that the first building <br /> would need to be built by April 2014, according to the permit, but they hoped to build the <br /> infrastructure for Market Street by April 2014, and the buildings as fast as possible. In each <br /> structure, it was expected that there would be approximately six -bedroom units - <br /> square feet) and two 2-bedroom units(12 50 square feet). Mr. Connell stated that they could not <br /> differentiate the size of affordable units but that they would be"floating"'units as recommended <br /> by Mass Dousing. FIs. Egloff noted that the Committee had in the past suggested no <br /> differentiation of units. Ms. Egloff inquired about accessibility and Mr. Connell referenced the <br /> foot height elevation difference of the structures that would allow accessibility. Mr. Connell <br /> explained that, doe to the elevation difference, there would be zero-step access from the sidewalk <br /> from two sides of the structure, commercial and residential. It was expected that in each <br /> building, one -bedroom and two I-bedrooms would he ADA,compliant, though there would be <br /> no elevators. Ms. Egloffrequested a rendering of the more modest of structures and clarification <br /> regarding the location of the affordable units. Mr. Connell noted that they were operating on a <br /> tight budget and that all units would be efficient and, although they.planned to float affordable <br /> units, they would also be required to designate units, but that they would consult with the <br /> Affordable Rousing Committee. Ms. Springer inquired about studios and Mr. Connell stated that <br /> there was a waiting list for existing studio units. Mr. Isbit inquired about commercial <br /> development and W. Connell responded that the plan was permitted for 40,000 square feet but <br /> that they expected to instead develop 35,000 square Feet, with 12,000 developed during phase I <br /> on Market Street. <br /> Mr. Connell indicated that l ashpee Comm' <br /> would be willing to corns back at another time to <br /> l <br /> . ee the AHC iInformed about their laps. &. Connell stated that the permit had been expanded <br /> twice and that the project would need to be shed next April, but that there were also challenges <br /> with financing. Mr. Connell pointed out that N4ashpee Commons wanted the project to reflect <br /> the needs of the community and that.the Governor wanted the project to be successful. Later in <br /> the meeting, Ms. Egloff recommended that a copy of the presentation be forwarded to File as part <br /> of the official record and the Chair indicated that he would make the request of Mashpee <br /> Commons. <br /> OLD BUSINESS <br /> Feasibility Study Status <br /> Chairman Abbott reported that the Town had signed the contract brit that it had not yet been <br /> returned from Horsley Witten. <br /> s <br /> Land Study <br /> Mr. Johnson summafized that three warrants had been prepared for Town Meeting, two for <br /> Habitat for Humanity and one for Conservation. <br /> Committee Members Reports <br /> 1 . Egloff referenced the Chair7s arti <br />