03/04/1993 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission March 4, 1993 Page 4. Mr. Sherman Stated he has added floats to the existing licensed float; the 10 x 20 and 6 x 20 are not permitted. Mr, DiGregorio advised the new pilings will be driven not ,betted. There is a small bank of hardshell clams just to the property line. Additional batter piles on the outside of the vessel will be for stone events. Mr. Desrosiers questioned the meed for a series of floats; he felt one is sufficient for access to the boats. Mrs. Simmons suggested giving him the 10 x 20 and removing the other two, then he would only have to put in one batter pile. Mr. McNerish stated the reason proposed is in the event of a urge stoma. Advice he received it is better to have piles on both sides of the Gressel. Mr. Desrosiers _. not feel the Commission should against policy and pest 380 s.f. he was concerned with setting a precedent. He would want the boat secured. Mr. Sherman checked the RDA and found it was for replacing two piles, not three. He asked if After-The-Fact filing fees were paid for the illegal floats? . DiGregorio had treated them as existing. Mr. Hor ever suggested issuing an enforcement order for removal of the 6 x 20, removal of the 6 x 10, and.the double set of batter piles be cut off at ground level., then plans for permitting double batter piles will be entertained. Mr. Sherman stated deck. work is to be a separate filing, although the Commission i under no obligation to do that. Mrs. Simmons stated it certainly needs an enforcement order and a fine; she would fine the contractor and Kittle River, or whoever put the 6 piles in. Mr, Sheman stated the enforcement order could be for the removal of the unauthorized floats not permitted by the Chapter 91 license and at the same time mandate a filing for the deck work, Mr. DiGregorio stated it was difficult for there, coming in not knowing what had gone n. Mr. Sherman questioned how this should be handled Ndien he was authorized under an RDA to put in two pilings when in fact, he put in gree double pilings, Mr. Desrosiers stated he could file with After-The-Fact fees, Mr. DiGregorio felt that would be better than pulling out the pilings. Mr. Sherman suggested- continuing_ the hearing and he would sit down with Mr. DiGregorio to work out the extra fees to be paid for those additional pilings. Mr. Homeyer insisted that the pilings be out off at the bottom level. Mr. Sherman stated if the extra pilings can meet the performance standards he should be allowed to-file for- them but should pay the extra fees. Mr. I ome er was referring to the two piles that were no longer-'essential, Mr. Sherman did not see any sense in removing them. He�did not -want to,see pressure treated wood out under water and the chips left there.