Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> April 9, 1992 <br /> Page 3. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked where, in relation to the coastal bank. It is on the other side <br /> f the road. It is entirely in the coastal bank; it goes along the edge of the <br /> pavement. <br /> The public was not made aware of this change in plan. Mr. Sherman advised there <br /> are a number of procedural reasons why this cannot be closed. The Notice of <br /> Intent would have to be amended and provided to the Mate also. Another fee <br /> may be invoked. <br /> M . Zeppenfeld asked if the lighting is withdrawn, could the hearing be closed <br /> tonight? <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the attestation is missing, it can be closed upon receipt of <br /> proof of ownership, <br /> The Chairman called for public comments; there were none. <br /> Motion rade and seconded to close upon receipt of proof of ownership* <br /> T ]BE CLOSED UPON RECEIPT, <br /> :00 MMON KUMIN., for the reconstruction of an existing timber retaining wall <br /> t 44 Bayview Road and construction of a new retaining wall at 40 Bayview Road. <br /> Bob Gray presenting. Abutter notification receipts were provided. He stated <br /> plans 1n the file do not show the addition to the house. He wants to add this <br /> to the Notice of Intent. It was included in the notice to the abutters. <br /> Asked if in the narrative or Notice of Intent, Mr. Gray stated he can give this <br /> to the Corssion under separate cover. All abutters have been notified. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated Board of Health sign-off would be necessary to see if septic <br /> upgrade would be required. He asked if a cover letter had been sent to DEP? <br /> Mr. Gray just got the plan tonight. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the hearing can be continued to a date certain where it should <br /> be readvertised. The Commission would meed a narrative, an amended notice and <br /> an indi <br />