Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Coni.ssion <br /> June 41, 1992 <br /> Page 2. <br /> The owner of Unit #637 care forward. He stated the fence is set back from the <br /> original location and from the viewpoint of safety, it invites people to jump over <br /> the fence. It should be roved closer to the berm. Where it is now, it is easier <br /> to go up and over. <br /> Mrs. Simmons asked who polices the area and was told the people on the bluff# <br /> Mr. & Mrs. Martin asked if the fence could be moved further forward with plantings <br /> to discourage people from climbing over? <br /> Mrs. Simmonsstated nothing should be going on over the Fence. She suggested some <br /> signs be posted. People must be educated to know the damage they are doing, <br /> Mrs. Martin stated they are notified by New Seabury to stay away from the .berm. <br /> It was noted the Wilding Inspector looked at the fence prior to the emergency <br /> artier and Michael Grotzke and Doug Boyd felt that in the best interest of public <br /> safety, that was the proper location. • <br /> Mrs. Simons suggested the temporary placement of snow fencing in front of the <br /> fence to discourage people. <br /> Mr. Hayes stated that would detract aesthetically. <br /> Mr. Margn stated they could plant on the other sine of the fence but Mrs. Simons <br /> stated they cannot do that as there is Rosa Rugosa back there. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated this is what is put forth in front of the Commission now; it isJ <br /> buffer zone and must be considered in the interests of the act. The Commission <br /> could condition that there be no rowing in front of the fence. <br /> Mr. Hayes stated the landscape design calls for very intensive plantings of Rosa <br /> Rugosa and beach grass. He agreed to write into the RDA that there would be no <br /> rowing on the other sicca of the fence. <br /> Mrs. Martin asked if the fence could be moved in front of their condo? <br /> Mrs. Simmons stated the Commission is trying to deal with what is in front of them. <br /> M . Sherman stated they can file their own RDA. <br /> Ms Lanrik stated it should be kept in mind that it is temporary. <br /> Mrs. Martin stated this will hurt them financially. <br /> Ms Lannik advised the Commssion cannot consider financial matters, even though they <br /> right wart to. <br /> VCrfE: Motion made and seconded to find a negative ietermr, tion upon receipt of <br /> revised request to be submitted by Norman Mayes with no mowing included <br /> and proof of submission to DEP. <br /> NEGATM N PENDING. - <br />