6/25/1992 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission June 25, 1992 Page 5. 8:10 P, BANKS for a Determination of Applicability on the proposed replacement of two pilings and a request for maintenance in perpetuity for a pier, float and two ramps at 362 Monomoscoy Road. Mr. Hanks provided abutter notification receipts, He advised he has two pilings that have been eaten by organic and ice and he would like to replace them with pressure treated. He has a Chapter 91 license with permission to maintain. his was overlooked in the original Order of Conditions. Mr. McGrath suggested the organism is an "dour Glass Worm"', shown in a book he has. Public coments were requested; here were none. Vow: Motion made and seconded to find a negative determination. nRTF.RMIMION, 8:20 1 R REALTY TRUST, continued from May 21, 1992. Mir. & firs. Rosenberg presenting with Michael McGrath. The revised plan extends the floats the sane width as was existing. Concerning the questions raised, the existing float, how did the licensed 8 x 16 get to be 8 x 2 A letter was submitted from Little River Boatyard, the float installed in 1980 replaced a float there before. Mr. Sherman asked if the Chapter 91 permit was recorded and was told it was. 4 Mr. McGrath advised Fugro-McLelland sampled the bottom forter quality. They '.. stated no shellfish below the float. They added conditions existing on the site. Changes were reconfiguration of the d -.veway and walks. Change in the float: Mr. McGrath stated he talked with the shellfish warden and he had no problem with the extending of the float. The IEP letter strengthened his opinion. Mr. Rosenberg submitted a brochure on the boat he will be purchasing. The Moat is 3%, for securing of the boat. Occasionally, thre will be a second boat, his son's. There is a wire fence runnuig around the site, a s ii i-rig pool requurerent. Mrs. Terrio asked the size of the boats and was told the boat is 321 10" with a 25-36" draft. Mr, Desrosiers stated the plan as shown has three delineations. The total float is 24; 192 s.f. , within the 200 s.f discussed. Mr. Sherman advio sed Rick York, Shellfish warden, has input to clarify matters. The four foot longer float is perr i t to l a under Amnesty but that does not mean it is incumbent upon us to permit it, It was a violation back in 1980 but he does not mean this to be an enforcement situation. Rick York sampled today and found claws and quahogs. He has questions about the sampling techniques. He found it a viable bottom with shellfish. 5 Mr. Sherman stated the concern is Land Under the Ocean. He read from the Act. The Commission has to decide where there is a discrepancy in reports. one optica would be to bring in a consultant of the Commission, size and shading effects should be addressed. Mrs., Terrio asked if the reason for the extension• was due to the boats? Mr. McGrath stated 8 x 20 would be very short for the length of his boat. i