Laserfiche WebLink
Conservationomission <br /> January 2 , 1991 <br /> Page 3. <br /> Mr. Desrosiers felt stamps were unnecessary for this project; it is obvious there <br /> is no boundary jurisdiction or encroachment on any wildlife habitat. -� <br /> Mr. Sherman agreed. <br /> Mr. Coffey read from the work description: all work to be done by hand except for <br /> transportation ofmaterials such as turf and crushed shells. Sed will be indigenous <br /> to the area. He asked if it is the agent's recommendation that hero are no conser- <br /> vation concerns and was told there were none. <br /> VOTE: Motion rade and seconded to find a negative determination. Unanimous vote. <br /> N =INE DETERNIMION. <br /> 8:00 JOM W. CRAM for the construction of additions; inground swing pool; pump <br /> house; wood patio; decks; and installation of a Title v sewage disposal system at <br /> l Keel way. Bob Raymond of Arrow Engineering presented abutter receipts. The <br /> patio is to be wood on sono tubes. The pool will be disinfected with ozone vacuum <br /> system. Nater will be allowed to stand until all disinfectant is dissolved prior <br /> to discharging. They are working with the Board of Health on a new Title v system <br /> which is beyond the 100 foot from the top of the coastal bask. There are two <br /> amendments, one reducing the size of the shed and rotating it, and a gravel drive <br /> to be in a relocated position. It is out of the jurisdiction of the commission. <br /> Areas indicated in red are the proposed amendments. The shed is being rotated so <br /> as not to obscure the view from the dining room, <br /> Mr. Sherman advised he viewed it today and has no concerns. There in no erosion <br /> potential. The revised plan, if the plan of record, will require a stamp. <br /> Mr. Raymond offered to make the changes on the plan if the board deers it to be <br /> necessary. <br /> Mrs. Simmons pointed out the notice should be amended also. <br /> Mr, Sherman felt the plan reflects the project satisfactorily. <br /> Mr. Coffey asked the construction techniques of the pump house and pool overflow's <br /> Mr. Raymond advised the pump house and patio will be wood construction and will <br /> be on a block foundation. The overflow system will be allowed to stand until <br /> disinfectants expiate to the atmosphere, overflow in the range of 18 inches <br /> will 'be discharged into the leach pit. Asked if it will meet Title v Ground <br /> Water Standards, he stated it will. They are ging into Highwood Water and do <br /> not have a concern With wells. <br /> Mrs. Simons asked how many trees would be lost around the deck area and was told <br /> or 8. she asked if it would be easier to try to sage then if the work limit was <br /> brought in to the deck line He did not think 'so. She asked if they would rind <br /> if the commission conditioned that tree trunks be protected. Mr. Raymond had no <br /> problem with that. <br /> Mr. Coffey stated loss of trees would be a concern to be addressed in a revegetation <br /> Plan. Mr. Raymond had a revegetation plan which was provided with a planting sched- <br /> ule. <br /> Mr. Sherman approved of the choice of shrubs and stated it is not a very suitable <br /> area for wildlife now; this will be an enhancement. <br /> Mrs. Simmons suggested, wi th foot traffic to the existing dock, a 4 X 4 foot plat- <br /> fonn be placed to protect the crown of the bank. <br />