Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> tebruqry , 1991 <br /> a <br /> ge +, <br /> 8:45 PARMOTIS ZAFIROPOULOS for the proposed construction of a 14 foot brick <br /> patio; removal of 49 linear feet of creosote railroad tie wall and replaced with <br /> concrete block at 39 Fiddler Crab Lane. Dave Sanicki and Peter Vanderbil were <br /> present for the hearing. <br /> Mr. Saracki advised there were two outstanding Orders of Conditions, for the dock <br /> and renovation of the house. A rotting railroad tie wall was partially replaced <br /> which was not included in the order of conditions. They are requesting to remove <br /> the remainder of the wall and replace with concrete block also. An open-jointed <br /> brick patio is proposed in the area beneath what used to be a deck area. <br /> A plan was distributed, <br /> Mr. Sherman advised the work was stopped because it was not described in the <br /> original Notice of Intent and is very close to the top of the bank. He felt <br /> it should come before the Commission again. Also, the silt screen was placed <br /> in such a way that it was off the ground; haybales are doing the ;job at the <br /> moment, <br /> Mr. Coffey asked the height of the proposed gall and was told 3-1/2 - 4 feet. <br /> It will be totally backfilled and the wall will be strengthened with Rebar and <br /> wire also. The galls have footings. <br /> Mr. Coffey questioned grade and proposed drainage? Mr. Sanicki stated the slope <br /> goes up gradient and then clown into the basement. It is not a full. basement. <br /> Mrs. Simmons expressed concern with debris on the bank side; the bank is deplorable. <br /> Where has been cutting for a wood pile. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated cutting has been done on the bank in the past and 'it should be <br /> put in the Order of Conditions this is prohibited. <br /> Mr. Sanickl recapped the past history of the projects on this property and <br /> requested an appropriate Order of Conditions. <br /> Mr. Sherman did not believe it to be a major problem if the .bank is cleaned up; <br /> erosion control measures are in place for the entire project; and the new entrance <br /> way is structurally sound. That should allay Commission concerns. He suggested <br /> before an Order of Conditions is issued, an on-site be conducted to consider ex- <br /> tending erosion control. <br /> Mr. Coffey asked if plantings should be done on the bank? He requested a brief <br /> narrative, or a block,on the plan, of the wall construction. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to close the hearing pending a narrative and <br /> details of the wall, and an on-site. Unanimous Note. <br /> FEMIlM NARMM AM ON-SITE, <br /> 00 BRADFORD WHEATLEY, continued from January 24, 1991. It was noted the <br /> property was not staked again. A letter from Mr, Buckley of New Seabury <br /> Engineering was read into the record requesting a continuance. <br /> CONTINUED TO MARCH 7. 1991 - 8:15 p.m. <br />