Laserfiche WebLink
onservation Commission <br /> March 21, 1991 <br /> Page 3. <br /> Articles were presented for two herbicides, alternatives for sonar. Application <br /> w3.11 be made to_ the state to use herbicides and treatment twice this year may b <br /> required. <br /> Neil Besse of the Perdnsual Council Mated he has a great deal of confidence in <br /> Mr. Lyman, <br /> CONTDM TO APRIL 4, 1991 — 9:3 . <br /> 9:00 TMDOR . ADAMfor the restabili ation of the coastal band reconstruction <br /> of the existing seaway and repairs to an existing staircase at 78 Triton Way. <br /> Bob Raymond presenting. DEP comments were not received as they had not received <br /> copy of the filing until recently. Abutter receipts were presented. An emergency <br /> certification was requested and denfed. The bank <br /> �s washing away progressively. <br /> To the question of location of staircase, Mr. Raymond advised it is on the left <br /> side facing the water. The bank is to be stabilized With duneras and <br /> g Rosa <br /> Rugosa; Scrub Pine also. <br /> Asked if collapse of the seawall was the reason for the washout Mr. Raymond yrs advised <br /> the sand has washed out from behind and underneath the seawall. It hes been there <br /> about 15 gears. Bonita is scheduled to do the construction. The 6000 lb. toe stone <br /> will be buried five feet. Access will be from Tide Watch. <br /> Ms Behrman requested written notification that permission to use the access was <br /> granted. <br /> Mr. Raymond stated any stone brought in will be along the beach area above Mean High <br /> Water. Stones will not be stored on the beach. <br /> Imo`. Grotzke advised any comments he made concerning bot 70 Tide Run would apply <br /> F y <br /> here as well. There has been significant lass of beach sediment caused by the <br /> seawall itself and the nature of the construction of the seawall; they should b <br /> designed much more roughly. He • <br /> asked that beach nourishment be considered, <br /> Mr. Raymond advised the wall will not be mortared, filter fabric will retain the <br /> sand and chinking will tighten up the wall. <br /> Mr, Homeye r suggested If the applicant i s opposed to beach nourishment, o sine <br /> should be done to, see what damage has been � <br /> g clone t o the entire property line within <br /> 30 days of completion of the project and thea eve year or other year. If a loss <br /> of -10 � � <br /> beach nourishment will have t be dome. He raised the issue of the double <br /> wall construction vs single and requested depth and size of the toe stones. <br /> Mr. Grotzke advised a monitoring program is being done and at Tide Watch they have <br /> lost two foot of de th 'us t out from the wall, <br /> all. <br /> Ms Behrrmar stated the angle to the beach is very steepand suggested a gentler slope. <br /> She asked if gg g <br /> has information on this and was told it is believed they do. A <br /> copy to be sent to ,aim O'Connell for comments, <br /> Mrs, skmons would like to see a fence 5-6 feet away from the top of the bark with <br /> the present one left in place to deteriorate. A foot dee platform should be <br /> placed t the t p p- <br /> op of the stairs, �s should be on the plan with details of how <br /> the stairs will be put in. <br /> Mr. Sherman had concerns about closing off the path going to Tide <br /> a t ch. He sugg- <br /> ested they work with New Seabury to interface the two projects and that the Arborist t <br />