Laserfiche WebLink
F Conservation Commission <br /> September 6, 1990 <br /> Page 4. <br /> number combination. Also, a sign is to be posted that "absolutely no children will <br /> be allowed on the dock unless accompanied by a parent's. "There will be a 10 minute <br /> period to unload a boat and reload. <br /> . Sanicki advised the association is willing to police the use and control this <br /> facility. <br /> Mr. Coffey asked if, as an association bylaw, owners are going to be required to <br /> keep their boats elsewhere or stored on a rack? <br /> Mts. Barone stated there are only a certain amount of moorings, which will not <br /> increase, so there cannot be any more dinghies. <br /> Mr. Coffer stated the dinghies already stored on the marsh and the potential for <br /> more are a concern. <br /> Ms Behrman added that the storage of Moats on the marsh is also a concern. It is <br /> an on-going detriment and the C mmssi n has the authority already, with the reg- <br /> ulations for Moats which should not be stored on a marsh. Enforcement orders and <br /> fines can be issued to the parties on whose land the Moat or dinghies are placed. <br /> r. Sherman suggested talking with the new harbormaster for a possible solution. <br /> Mr. Coffer explained the issue is that salt marsh grasses are used to 100% light, <br /> they are unshaded by anything else in nature. Being covered for any duration, <br /> ie an overturned dinghy, deprives thea of the way they have evolved.; they cannot <br /> tolerate a lass of sunlight. <br /> Mr. Sanicki suggested a special on-going condition that .a sign be posted in an <br /> appropriate location that dinghies not be placed on the marsh. <br /> Mr. Coffey asked if dinghies are tr il.ered to the area and was told only on rave <br /> occasions when someone may take a little sailboat dawn there, <br /> Mir. Coffer 'asked if it would be a hardship if that were unacceptable and was told <br /> it would not be and there would be no objection if conditioned. <br /> Mr. York felt the Commission should promote association docks. <br /> Mr. Coffey noted there is a difference between association docks and community docks. ; <br /> An association dock does not preclude development rights on privately owned parcels <br /> s a con ni ty dock would which most definitely would be encouraged. Before the <br /> Commission is an association dock which should also be encouraged. <br /> The Shellfish warden is to get a copy of the Sabatia report. <br /> 1 <br /> CCNTINUED TO OCTOBER 18 1990 - 8:45 P.M. T REQUEST OF TIM, APPLICANT, <br /> 8:15 JAS SUUIIVM,, Lot 14 Redwood Circle, Continued from May 31., 1990. <br /> MTINM TO NOVEMBER 15, 1990 - 7:45 P.M. AT THEUQUEST CE THE APPLICA . <br /> 01r. Coffey suggested this be the last continuation allowed. <br /> 8:30 ANTONIO PULSONE, Lot 49 Horseshoe Bend way, for a Determination of Applicability <br /> n a proposed site analysis to determi <br />