My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/04/1990 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
10/04/1990 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2018 5:03:44 PM
Creation date
1/29/2018 1:03:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/04/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation Coffrnssion <br /> October 4, 1990 <br /> Page 4. <br /> be constructed in wood instead of brick for a better blend with the house. The <br /> driveway will be asphalt and they do not anticipate a problem with runoff. <br /> Ms Behr an asked if there is any change in grade and was told the grade is 2 feet <br /> lower than the existing driveway, It is approximately 100 feet from the beach to <br /> the driveway. <br /> Mr. Coffey asked if there was provision for runoff with the asphaltsurface? <br /> Mr. Miskovsky stated the existing driveway will be removed; they will regrade and <br /> resurface. <br /> It was noted a receipt was received for the removal of the asphalt. <br /> Ms Behrman pointed out, on the previous Order of Conditions, the final approved <br /> plan must be recorded at the Registry of Deeds. They will be changing grades and <br /> depositing fill; there is no change of grade on the plan. <br /> Mr. Miskovsky stated there is more than 1 ft. difference; this will have to be <br /> filled, <br /> Mr.. Sherman advised this was not presented to the Commission before. <br /> Mr. Miskovsky stated he wILll have the engineers superimpose the grades upon the <br /> plan. Ms Behrman agreed that would be satisfactory and added, and the amount of <br /> fill to be used. <br /> Mr. Coffey suggested they list the changes and have an engineered plan with the <br /> engineer s comment that it is superior to the previous plan. Mr. Miskovsky agreed. <br /> TD BE CLOSED AT THE NM HEARIM AFTER RBCEIT OF PLANS. <br /> 00 14EW Sim GO... Shore Drive, continued hearing. Brian Zeppenfeld presenting <br /> with Michael Grotzke and Alan Abrahamson. A dafinitive landscape plan was presented <br /> for review. They had been asked to write orders of conditions but Mr. Zeppenfeld <br /> stated he felt the standard orders were specific enough to cover anything that may <br /> come up. On the septic changes, there was an addendum. They pulled out the existing <br /> ramp and revegetated putting silt fences at the top and also at the toe. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the only items to be considered tonight are footprints and <br /> landscaping; septics are not to be addressed. <br /> Mr. Zeppenfeld advised plans are complete but have not gotten to Board of Health. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked if the footprints as shown are acuate and was told they are <br /> final and accurate, <br /> Mr. Abrahamson advised the limit of seaward development has been maintained. <br /> Sheet one reflects the entrance at Popponesset Inn. Site development is more <br /> defined with picket fences. They plan a series of courtyards rather than drive- <br /> way . <br /> Mr. Zeppenfeld advised they will be developed privately and any changes in foot- <br /> print will require Commission approval., <br /> Ms Lannik asked if there will be deed restrictions? Mr. trot ke stated he would <br /> be willing to have deed restrictions that would li <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.