Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 'Conservation Commission <br /> February 8, 1990 <br /> Page 2. <br /> 7:30 William- H. Burke, 527 Triton Way for the construction of a 45.5 ft. sheet <br /> pile foundation support structure along the property line of lots 527 & 528 <br /> Triton Way. } <br /> CONTINUED To MARCH 2 , 1990 - 8:30 AT THE REQUEST of THE APPLICANT. <br /> 7;45 Ellen M. Shepherd, 38 Quaker Run Road, for a determination of applicability, <br /> on a -proposal to replace ars existing patio and walkway, Guy Shepherd presenting. <br /> A slab was poured around the house with a patio and walkway after the house was <br /> built which has begun to sink, with water going between the house and patio. <br /> The patio was broken up and they were Doing to rebuild not knowing they were <br /> in violation. Gravel has been put back in place. They are just replacing <br /> what was there. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated he did not see any environmental damage at this point. The <br /> patio is 10 - 12 feet from the top of the bank. The area is a flat plateau. <br /> Mr. Shepherd advised there is a lawn around the entire perimeter of the house. <br /> The patio was broken up and taken off the premises. Gutters direct roof run- <br /> off from the patio. The cement will be pitched to a drywel l. <br /> VOTE: Due to the limited project and the cooperation -of the applicant, <br /> Notion rude and seconded to issue a negative determination. � <br /> NEGATIVE DETERMINATION ISSUED; <br /> 8:00 Bradgate Builders, Lot 81 Noisy .Hole) Road. , <br /> CONTINUED To FEBRUARY 229 19,90 - - :45 T- THE REQUEST OF THE- APPLICANT. <br /> 8:01 Robert Buonato, for an enc i st-i n f i iced' walkway uppor~t d, bar 12 -inch -diameter <br /> pressure treated.'piles',, <br /> i les,, ramp, and 2-81 X 15' floats at Lot 44 Poppones et Island <br /> Road. - SE 43-5491, SE 43-848-,, Abutter receipts were pre ented .and an as-built <br /> plan reviewed. Nr. -Thorng,. adv i sed that ori -the -prop -sed planeros sect i on._ <br /> showed 10 ft. 'on"center,, however, the plan ways'' drafted 8- ft,. 'on centers It i s - <br /> 21 ft., longer, but ohly 18, ft, further into Popponess t Bay. , -1t was not= the <br /> i ritent i ori to bu i.l d a l on er' dock . Mean High Water to the edge of the pier i <br /> 95 feet. - The dock 'was built -last year.- A.- crushed stone walkway was conditioned. <br /> The butdoor shower was te' moved. He spoke with''Chapter 91 and they advised they <br /> have 16 .plus minus-I al lowabte for error; 10% of 159 would be 15.9, they are <br /> .-at 21'. 7. Board. of Appeals has not been contacted. <br /> Paul Somerville stated the work was done by Crosby who used a jet during the <br /> early summer, This should have been dome in the non-growing season. There is <br /> still- sediment around one of the pilings which has not settled and the algae <br /> is collecting in the hole. He suggested use impacts rrus t be considered. He <br /> would also life to see more soundings in that area. <br /> Nr. Coffey asked if it could be constructed under the present bylaw and Mr, Thorn <br /> stated that it couldn't. At was noted it originally went through Board of Appeals. <br />