Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> J Une 14, .1990 <br /> Page 4. <br /> not possible to notify abutter but fliers (copy presented were distributed t <br /> 100 area residents and posted at WBNERR. This is a research project to eval- <br /> uate how or whether or not the development of the macroa l gae is affecting fish <br /> and shellfish and eel grass areas. It is their belief that macroalgae is wiping <br /> eel grass out all together. <br /> They will be removing all the ma roalgae from an area 25 meters by 25 meters <br /> and thea comparing over time the response of the fish and vertebrae and eelgrass <br /> to this removal . The method used will be scuba diving with toothbrushes, The <br /> area is 3 feet deep at low tide, 3-1 at high. <br /> Mr. Halpern stated he was concerned with saf , .. The stakes will be barely <br /> visible at high tide and will not be seen by anyone using a boat at night. <br /> Ms Meagan advised the original design was 50 meters by 50 meters but this would <br /> be physically impossible to remove that much algae; they chose the areas ever <br /> more close to shore to be out of the way of boaters. The stake that would be <br /> out of the water is gone and they have added more floats. They have wrapped <br /> all of the stakes with reflective tape. If an issue, they will remove the <br /> stakes altogether. They will use the post for anchoring to. There are five <br /> posts per plot with about 15 floats between the posts. Plastic netting keeps <br /> the algae from drifting into the removal plot. <br /> Mr. Halpern felt the netting would be a navigational hazard. <br /> Ms Be h rma n pointed out this is not within the jurisdiction of the commission. <br /> Paul Somerville stated the macr algae is a concern of his and asked to receive <br /> updates on their f i nd i ng s. He advised the Law-tons, present for a later hearing, <br /> live in the area and called him last summer .re macroalgae that moved in right <br /> in front of their property and there was a clam Till there. <br /> 1r , Sherman stated the research is vital and heartily endorsed a negative <br /> finding. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded for a negative finding. <br /> NEGATIVE FINDING. <br /> 9:00 ALBERT LAWT N for a determination of applicability on a proposal to <br /> replace an existing retaining wall and deck with a new deck and three season <br /> sunroom at 27 Monomoscoy Road West. Abutter receipts were presented. There <br /> is an order of Conditions under SE 43-168 on the property, <br /> 1r. Lawton stated the original plans -submitted are the same dimensions as the <br /> proposed. Sono tubes will be used for the sunroo . <br /> 1r. Sherman feels there will be no impact in the resource area. Board of <br /> Health notice stated plans have not been submitted. lir. Lawton advised they . <br /> were seat to the Board of Health at Ir. Sherman`s request. <br /> Mr. Sherman suggested a negative finding when Board of Health approval is <br /> received. <br /> VOTE: MOtion made and seconded for a negative finding. Decision to be held <br /> pending confirmation from the Board of Health. <br /> NEGATIVE DETERMINATION. <br />