Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> November 1 , 1990 <br /> Page 7. <br /> Mr. McNevish advised he checked the dock and it is structurally sound but recommended <br /> cross-bracing on the outer posts. <br /> Mr. DiGregorio stated there is enough canopy and the proposal should increase canopy <br /> density. It is a thinning practice, not clear cutting. There will be no root de- <br /> stabilization. There will be no work below the water line on the dock. Ms Scanlon <br /> is seeking to maintain the dock above the water line with no enlargement. It can <br /> be put in the order of Conditions removal of the + X 4 in the future would require <br /> a separate filing. <br /> Mr. Sherman concurred it would benefit from sore thinning ng as did Mrs. Simmons. <br /> Mr. DiGregorio advised they will be obtaining Chapter 91 license. Army Corps of <br /> Engineers is not necessary. It is not a tidal area. <br /> There were no comments from the public, <br /> UM: Motion rade and seconded to close the hearing. <br /> COQ . <br /> 9:15 NIMM, VINIW for an after-the-fact--filing for a stairway on a bank, wood <br /> retaining wall, seasonal dock and beach nourishment at 69 Janes Circle. George <br /> Thorng presented abutter receipts. This is ars after-the-fact filing. A wood <br /> retaining wall was i <br />