Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> December 2`7, 1990 <br /> Page 5. <br /> Mr. Coffey asked if the plans are Proposed to be revised in combination with 1377 and <br /> 1378 and the matter won't just die there'd <br /> Mr. Zeppenfeld advised 1379 will go back to the original plan, restoring the dune with <br /> sand and vegetating with beach grass, bringing in beach plum, and having the fence. <br /> Mr. Coffey stated, with the fence, they are looking to close it out with a negative <br /> determination on continuing the fence sections through the gap, Mr, tarot ke stated <br /> that is correct. <br /> Mr. Coffey stated that would clear one off the agenda and we will see more about the <br /> gap with later hearings. Mr. Grotke agreed. <br /> The Chairman called for comments from the public; there were n ne q - <br /> Vo : Motion made and. seconded. to -_find negative determination to allow this to <br /> proceed.-' - Unanimous vote. <br /> :W MW SAY Co,, Lots 1377 & 1378 Shore Drive Com fined Dot i: 79 Shore Drive, <br /> continued from N mer 29, Michael Gr,otzke presenting. Revised septic and landscape <br /> Plans were resented, the lands a in has remained un tan eta. It is now a three car <br /> g g <br /> parking area. theA-`e is cgetati n all ar un a small enclosed patio wiLn fence. <br /> Access will g(-:- dtxwn '�-m -exi-sting grass pa�h to beac,1 . It is con i, �en,,'., w�_th <br /> plan shown a mont-t age. The access at the .south-ast ena of the lot at the CIE me is <br /> addressed. Ulere is ',severe erosion occ ring. <br /> Mr. Coffey questioned the foundation and was told it will be a poured 10 inch concrete <br /> frost wall three feet below grade on a footing. <br /> Mr. Coffey stated this can be scooped from W14 thin it's own perimeter cor.ding from the <br /> driveway. <br /> Mr. Desro iers asked about the septic? 'Mr, Grotzke stated the plans approved show <br /> it tucked back into the corner,. Also, it is shown densely vegetated with no pedestrian <br /> access in the area. Plantings to be rosy rugosa, myrtle and beach plum. <br /> Mr. Coffey advised the.'concept drew a round of applause when presented. <br /> Mr. Grotke stated it is a lot easier and will be a choice lot. <br /> Mr. Coffey asked if there iSL'-anything on Lot 1379 that directly wears on plantings <br /> that continue through' <br /> Mr., Grotzke stated there are no changes at all. He could foresee these plantings <br /> spilling over and restoring that section of the back that is eroding, but that has <br /> not been formally addressed in this drawing since on the adjacent lot. <br /> It could be put in the Order of Conditions that the bank be- restored with consistent <br /> plantings of rola rugosa. <br /> 1r. Desrosiers felt it would be an advantage to do that. <br /> Mr. Coffey questioned how to reference plantings on an adjacent lot on this order of <br /> Condi.t i on s. <br /> Mr. Grotzke suggested referencing back to this plan for the plantings continuing and <br /> restoration of the bank. <br /> Mr. Coffey asked if they were prepared to talk about Lot 1379 or is that future's <br />