Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> + f <br /> t <br /> Mash e e Conservation ommis s i on Page Nine <br /> Meeting of August 16, 1984 <br /> the issued Order of Conditions , What is the outcome of that?" <br /> Chairman Studley replayed, ""there is no outcome yet , I have not <br /> heard anything From DEQE at this point. I do realize there is <br /> problem and since the Conservation Commission ordered the cease <br /> and desist order, they can write a. nes order or make an amendment <br /> to the order. I , personally, am not in favor of Piling another <br /> 4' of fill on top of that bluff. All of the water is going to come <br /> doom from the higher elevations on that bluff,, " <br /> Mr.. Nahigia�n said, "The only water that' s oma <br /> Pyng- do m there now is <br /> water within loo' of the bluff. It' s pitched that way, once that i <br /> brought up to the grade of the retention area. which is 28" or 291 , <br /> then thereill be no water run-off in either direction. " <br /> Ms . Dardano said, " thank that you told us that it vias a require- <br /> ment of New s e abury that you bring it up to cover the foundations ; <br /> but I've also talked with them and was told that you don't have to <br /> cover them as long as you screen the foundations ," <br /> Ivr. er a.rdearosian: "For three years we've been trying to protect <br /> the embankment We started out with a wall . We went to a grassed-in <br /> program. The major damage to the embankment was caused by water <br /> run-off over the edge . We came t o you with a. Droposal that would <br /> Prevent water from running ove-n the edge) and you acce;�ped it . You <br /> a. ed us to move the cottages back - {kihich we did " Now we 're saying <br /> that we want t finish the project and bring the grade up so that <br /> the water will not run over the edge and you're telling us that you <br /> don"u- .giant us to do it and you've made some excuse that is invalird . <br /> New Seabury hCas nothing to do ,`,rlth it , " <br /> I,1s . . r a o . r ��,,he .. I i�o1 e $-; ,th one or you out on the site , you <br /> said that it was a requirement of the covenant that your exposed <br /> foundations be - covered." According to Hr. Rahigian and Mr. rma - <br /> deros is ., it was neither of them that Ms . Dardano spoke with, <br /> Mir. Dermarderosian said, "The architectural review Comm ittee has re- <br /> ferences but that is not the issue . " Ms . Dardano said that it was <br /> another gentleman who had told her that the foundations must be <br /> covered , Prx, Nahigian said , ",le don' t care about the fog ndations . <br /> ,. a.bout � grad .ng; r�rr r ar .�erosian said, Tl i�' <br /> reason why the foundations are e---posed '.s because the grades are <br /> supposed to be lifted to that levele o herivise we would have sunk <br /> the foundations into the ground <br /> Pauline eLary as'-0:1-.ed, "In your afire Ment with th a Tew S e abury, are you <br /> allowed to put drainage , gutters on your homes?" M . Nahigian: "Sure . <br /> ����cod n ones .'l Mrs . eLor : "�•�h not put in gutters and dry wells <br /> in to keep some of that water from running over the bluff and ai,iray <br /> from the be ing. " 1.1r.. Tava.res commented that it 'was still on�y a <br />