11/6/1986 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Ma hpee Conservation Commission Meet i n - of November 6, 1986 Page 2. M5 Bay 1 og stated this has been through the Board of Appeals and meets the 45 foot bylaw with a 25 foot variance. The total length of the dock., ramp, floats was questioned. The plan showed 60 feet total , however in adding the proposed lengths of 20 feet for the walkway, 20 feet for the dock and another 28 feet, not including the ramp, the figures do not coincide. Behr an questioned what is proposed for walking access . John Varkonda advised at a Board Appeals hearing , he had expressed his concern about erosion going down to where the steps had been and recommended a wooden apron with some veget- ated material along the Side to stabilize it. He states= he did not see an environ- mental n ir n- mental impact a-s long as there is an apron. . Bay l og agreed to recalculate the total length of the dock, including the ramp and provide the commission with revised plans . She also a r ee to include the apron. It was noted the draining of the Jacuzzi and swimming pool is causing erosion. It was suggested a letter to this effect be included with the order of Conditions . !s Bay l og agreed to mention this to the Gl icks also. HEARING CONTINUED UNTIL PLANS ARE SUBMITTED, AT WHICH TIME THE HEARING N WILL BE CLOSED AND AN ORDER of CONDITIONS ISSUED . 8: 15 - Ronald Hilton J.T. Thompson & Son) . Request for determination of appl ie- ab-i 1 i ty on a proposal to remove the existing roof of the dwelling and adding a second story at Lot 9 Flog Pond Close. John advised an enforcement order has been issued ori this property. Pi tores were presented to the commission. Mrs. Hilton has stated there is an order of Conditions for the project, but John was unable to find a record in the files . They are dumping a large amount of fill excavated from the cellar directly onto coastal bank and into the wetland. Mr. Thompson advised the commission that the work they are doing now has nothing to do with the project in this request. Mr . Hilton is having a new septic system installed and the foundation refurbished and he is not involved. Bob Gonsalves is the builder. The commission was in agreement that with an enforcement order outstanding , a positive determination would have to be issued whether or not Mr . Thompson i involved. It was noted if there is an existing order of Conditions, this could be added as an amendment. They would still b -learly in violation. Mr. Thompson asked that his request for determination of appl iabi 1 ity be with- drawn ith- drawn until the matter is cleared up. REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION o f APPLICABILITY WITHDRAWN