Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> Meeting of December 19, 1986 ' <br /> Page 6. <br /> The intent i s to also obtain an order of conditions for a permanent addition <br /> to the foundation and house, 10 ft x 12 ft, and also to bring the existing <br /> deck around the south side of the house. The new deck would Imre a height of <br /> -1 - 4 f ee t f rom g round 1 evel . There i s no requ e s t for I ands a p i ng , f i 1 1 i ng , <br /> earth moving or dredging. The area where the existing deck is now and all areas <br /> to Ockway Bay will be as they now exist. The concrete slab will stay. on the <br /> north side there wou 1 d be a .footing . Any fill not required would be tarn off <br /> site. Well and septic wi l 1 remain the same. <br /> Not shown on the plan, the southerly lot is also owned by the Col pi tts . It <br /> runs all the way down Daniels Island Road to the tennis courts and is presently <br /> under an approved abatement by the assessors for conservation purposes . <br /> It was noted the property has been sold and is under agreement. As part of the <br /> agreement, it requires obtaining legal status for the floating pier and also <br /> for the addition and deck. This was reviewed by town counsel and he did not <br /> foresee any problem. <br /> Mr. Benway recommended an order or conditions be issued requiring the walkway <br /> be elevated. The client would be w i 1 1 i n to conform. Town Counsel has advised <br /> where it can be proven to have been in existence for over three years , they <br /> could continue to operate it exactly as it is . Mr. Ben ay stated he could <br /> obtain the statute that applies . It is under pre-existing uses which were <br /> legal prior to the passing of laws in the commonwealth. He requested an <br /> order of conditions stating the walkway should not be resting on the marsh <br /> and elevate it -1 feet to the floating pier. <br /> Ids Beh rma n advised once ar f i iced walk-way is attached to a floating dock, al l <br /> the rules and regulations for a dock apply and would start the whole round . <br /> Mr. Ben ay stated they do not wish to do that. Ms Behrman further advised <br /> that any pre-existing situation that has started to cause damage to a wetland <br /> area, the commission does have the state laws which allow the commission to <br /> stop it. There is no time limit on that. <br /> It was agreed plans would have to be submitted for a properly designed dock <br /> and approvals are required before the commission could consider i t. Mrs . <br /> a rs ters stated i f seeking legal status for the dock, Mr . Benway should obtain <br /> legal opinion of counsel that it is a pre-existing legal use. The commission <br /> cannot give an order of conditions legal i i ng it until it has been redesigned <br /> to meet specifications. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated a number is required from D E B and they require plans <br /> of the as-built. <br /> Mr. Ben ay stated the Colpitts will continue to use it but they want to conform <br /> it to existing conditions and requirements of today with respect to the environ- <br /> ment. <br /> nviron- <br /> m nt. They do not want to give up their rights of what they have had for 15 years . <br /> After discussion, the recommendation of the commission was for Mr . Benway to <br /> come i n with plans showing a n elevated walkway , have a letter from an abutter <br /> documenting the existence of this pier prior to 1971 and request a determination <br /> of app i cabi 1 i t . <br /> Mr. Benway requested wi thdrtawaI of the deck portion of the app ration at this <br /> hearing and asked to go forward 1. i th the deck. <br />