3/24/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission Meting of March 2 , 1988 Page 8. with the 'two parcels voted for last year, there is 13.9% in Conservation purposes. Other Federal land such as Otis and Carp Edward would be 6. 16%. Other town land ie school , town dump is 2.79%. Something that could be considered open space is Camp Farley, but this could be u bd i v i d'ed and sold. It was noted the Trustees of Reservation have sold a large parcel on Central Ave. and there is a subdivision pian on it. The by-law has been approved by the Attorney General . There was discussion of the proposed amendments. The Chairman suggested a statement of purpose for th.e Comm- ission be made up. fir. Rosenberg stated this atrial ,, the statement of purpose, is in the regulations. A-copy of a letter to the Selectmen was read requesting appointment to the Conservation Commission as an alternate member by Denise M. Sullivan. VOTE: Motion made and seconded to send a letter of endorsement to the Selectmen re the appointment of Denise M. Sullivan. �k John Sullivan - Lots 14 & 15 Redwood Circle. A letter �,,tas read from his attorney stating he is not the owner of the streets in the development and listing proposals to rectify the drainage problems. He further states the structure on Lot 14 is 1'n substantially the sane location as shown on the plans submitted. The fact the dock is not shown is the fault of the architect. Dimensions shown on the sub- mitted plan and as-built plan were taken at different points in time and would be different as 0E relates to the water. It is admitted the septic is not placed i n the 'location shown on the original submittal plan and Mr. Sullivan will provide to the Commission a plan a uratei dep i Ct i ng the location of structures in- cluding ncluding the deck and septic system on this particular lot. Mr. Kir ane asked for a meeting with the Board. -Mr. Rosenberg stated the Commission -should have something with an Engineer' s stamp on it showing th location and certifying that it is the sane as the sub- mittal plan, or if it isn't, showing the differences. It �.-ias agreed the Association should be notified of the nearing. since there seems to be a question about the ownership of the roads. FRrET ORDERS: Henry Lane,EN atu i t Pond; Barbara John Landon, New Seabury. DAVID PARSONS - Lot 297 Hooppole Rd. A letter was read re the Order of Con- -ditions from All Cape Survey stat-i ng conditions #9, #19 and #22 should not be applied to this project. A letter was dictated: i tem 9: The commission has not given permission for the wa11 -to be placed along the existing water nark because of the stipulated re- striction e- striction on placement of the wall . This will require revision of fill ext i rate s Item 19: This states no landscaping requiring extensive fertilization or irrig- ation rrig- atiori shall be permitted and that again, as the area affected by the proposed wall is limited, the Commission wishes to know if landscaping intentions have