4/7/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission Meeting of April 7, 1988 Page 3. Ms Behrman asked if they received a Board of Health permit for the outdoor shower and what was the drainage. fir. Lundgren stated no permit was received and there is a large drywell . Ms Behrman stated this facility should not have been installed without a Board of Hea l.th permit. Mr. Lundgren stated he was net aware of this. Ms Beh rman stated before the commission can act on the plan, Board of Health Input is required. She expressed concern with the shower in that location with erosion going out through the viall . The Commission will require an Engineer' s certification on the structural stability of the wall including stability of the soils behind it in the base. Also, permitting documentation from the Board of Health on the shower. It should be indicated on the plan how much cubic footage of fill was placed behind the wall. Also, it should be indicated on the plan wh t the stairs lead to, a path,, etc. Mrs,. F rrida stated, if engineers approval of� the wall is received,, the erosion coming out from behind thel l st i I I has to be- dealt with, The steps to be taken should be part of the en i neer i s report. Ms Bearman stated there is a large amount of brush dumped on the edge of the wetland that was part of the enforcement order. , Mr, Lundgren Mated all brush has been cleared out, there are some logs. Ms Behrmn stated that is part of the material to be moved. Mrs. Ferriday suggested h ybales be put on each side of the wall where there is erosion. CONTINUED TO MAY 53 1988 -- 7:300 I - Robert Nahiglan (Cape & Islands Survey i n g . To construct a single family residence and sewage disposal system at Lot 39 Sandy Way. John Slavinsky presenting. Revised plan dated 11/18/87 was reviewed. - As suggested.-the house was mored back 10 feet from the wetland. Board of Appeals variance was received. The well was moved within 105 feet of the adjacent leaching. The amount of fill 'Jas cut to zero. The retaining wall will be 4 feet high. HEARING CLOSED. E1:30 - Cartal Development - Charles Talanian (Holmes & McGrath) Lot 9 Oc way Bay. Todd Palmentier presenting. The project was filed 1/86; was approved; r•ece i v ed an order of conditions, but pool and patio were denied and it was specified, no paved driveway. The order of Conditions was appealed to DE E. The pool and. patio were eliminated but Mr, Ta l an i an wished to retain the paged portion of the driveway. DEQ E up e l d the appeal with the modified plan. The latest revisions of 10/14 are outlined. Plans were sent to DEE requesting .a s u perked i ng order be amended to include the pian as before the Commission. They stated it was under the scope of the existing order. It is requested 'that the Commission amend the Order of Conditions under the Town bylaw to reflect the superceding Order. Mr. Rosenberg stated there cannot be a paved surface. Nor. Palmentier pointed p out that DEQE does not recommend it, but they do not specify they cannot have one. Mr. Rosenberg stated they would not have put these comments in if they were satisfied with the plan as submitted. It is clearly a request that the driveway be changed to a permeable surface and that erosion control and drywel l in g be put on the plan as recommended.