My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/14/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/14/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2018 5:02:42 PM
Creation date
2/16/2018 3:25:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/14/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation Commission <br /> July 1 , 1988 <br /> ,Page 2. F <br /> . issued b the Planning Board relating to the Meetinshou'si Condominium <br /> project further down Noisy sy Flole Road that the developer bring o i <br /> Hole Road up to present subdivision standards. Noisy Hole Road- is <br /> beins projected as a four-way intersection for Route 12 # <br /> point to be clarified, Lisa stated when speakins about the road, it <br /> is as it is now, <br /> Mr. Rosenbers stated it may not be adequate if there is an outstanding <br /> order to change the goad . <br /> Mr. Kirrane stated the road could, in fact, be below the elevation <br /> proposed. It is impossible for them to tell , at this juncture, what <br /> the elevation of Noisy Hole ..#load will be. It may be, in the design of <br /> Noisy Hole Road, ouch basins could be located at the intersection -of <br /> Noisy Hole Road and this proposed roadway. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg questioned whether the 'enSineering of Noisy Hole Road <br /> was done and stated this should be checked if an outstanding order of <br /> the Pl ann in S Board. <br /> Mr, Kirrane stated he was not sure but he represented that developer <br /> and to his knowledge the engineering at that location has yet to be <br /> performed. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated the projected flow into the wetland could be two <br /> or three times that as a result of building the road and there would <br /> be a problem. There is no idea of capacity. <br /> Mrs. Ferriday stated the Commission would want to know the capacity of <br /> what- the wetland could hold. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated there is no delineation of the size of the <br /> wetland , depth, or ground level with ire the wetland. <br /> r. Baxter stated the plan submitted with the Notice of Intent gives <br /> this information. <br /> TheCommission reviewed the plan. <br /> Mr. Kirrane stated the culvert under the road is to connect the two <br /> wetland areas. <br /> Mrs. Ferriday stated the plan submitted tonight is the culvert design <br /> and design calculations with indication which way the water will flow. <br /> Lisa asked if calculations show that these specific size culverts will <br /> be able to run enough water through and there will be no overtopping <br /> of the road. <br /> Mr. Baxter stated that is correct; his parameters reflect one-half <br /> inch of freeboard from the 50 year flood elevation and actually pass a <br /> 100 year storm. The design frequency for a culvert is the 50 year <br /> storm. There are now two 30 inch pipes. <br /> Mrs. Ferriday asked then to come ' back with ars answer as to how they <br /> are going to mitigate the water coming in and also a detailed plan of <br /> how the replication will be done. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.