Laserfiche WebLink
Eonserv,at.i-on Commi ss i on <br /> November 17, 1988 <br /> Page 26. <br /> Mr . Slavinsky stated a landscape plan is in the process of being doge <br /> he foresees no problem. ' <br /> Mrs. Simmons stated that wool first in the Order of Conditions, but <br /> first the house must be moved back further. her. Slavinsky asked how <br /> fair? Mrs. Simmons suggested 25 feet . <br /> Lisa suggested bringing the front of the- house back teahere' -the back <br /> I <br /> s to get it up on top of the flat. <br /> Mr. Slavins y agreed to pass on the word. He advised Cox Excavation <br /> dug the test pit. <br /> CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 15 8: 30 . . <br /> -- Joseph J. Carigl is (Holmes :& McGrath) For the construction and <br /> maintenance of a sonotube supported timber patio attached to <br /> the rear <br /> of an existing house within the 100 foot buffer zone of a coastal bank <br /> at 520 Triton Way. Todd Palna t l er presenting. The existIng house had <br /> an Order of Conditions to renovate the entire house; amended order for <br /> an addition to the north and an amended order was requested , for <br /> the <br /> patio and deck. The Commission required a full Notice of Inte-nt. <br /> i <br /> Abutters receipts were presented. Mr. I al ati r agreed the driveway ' <br /> could be of crushed store . <br /> Mrs . Si ons stated there should be no Srub6ing of roots ' rola r• go a$ <br /> or anything. Mr . Burns asked if they ovula come hack . av er to the <br /> house o save a cedar tree and Mrs, Simmons suggested cutting off the <br /> corner of the patio <br /> Pal mat i er stated he is 16 feet from- the bank 'and was not 'sure that <br />`. losing that cedar will jeopardize the stability of the bank. <br /> Mrs. Simmons stated it is the drainage u there 4tated ' he <br /> and asked if the patio <br /> w u l d e c xnne ted to the wall . Mr. Palma .i errbelieves the <br /> wall spans the two properties. <br /> Mr. Burns stated there are two seas of walls, the upper- and lower ones, <br /> tiers. <br /> Lisa asked if the walls were on any plans. Mr. Palmatier stated he his <br /> near seen a plan o f the walls. <br /> Ms Behrman suggested the walls be l oca e ' on plans and compared with <br /> the Order of Conditions the Cission has issued before acting. She <br /> expressed ,00ncie n with features on one or the other lot and not b.eing <br /> able to ,to tell which lot it is on that is not in compliance with the <br /> Order of Conditions. If that wall is partially on this lot it should <br /> be_ located on this <br /> pian. She noted here .was no oontinat__'on of topo- <br /> graphy over to the next lot. <br /> r. Palmatier stated the stone wall is new, incidental with all the <br /> renovat i ons on both the lots. s� �e r an ask ed i i tf i in any r der <br /> of Condi <br />