Laserfiche WebLink
r Conservation Commission <br /> March 2 , 1989 <br /> Page 3 ■ <br /> Nor. Burgmann stated he was not aware the amount of fill was also <br /> requested , Ms Behrman also asked about the alteration of grade . <br /> Mr , Coffey asked Mr . Burgmann for his opinion of the wall , He <br /> stated he has not seen it in person but it serves the purpose as <br /> a retainer for the pool . <br /> . Rosenberg stated it will be two separate properties at some <br /> point with two swimming pools <br /> i <br /> Mr. Burgr ann stated it is fir , carigIials responsibility as a seller , <br /> when he goes to sell it , to assure that the proper legal documents <br /> are in place , <br /> Ms Behrman asked if the driveway is on a permeable surface . <br /> . Burgmann believes it to be brick laid on a sand base . <br /> Mr . Rosenberg asked for something in writing with respect to that , <br /> Mr. Burgmann agreed . <br /> Mrs . Marsters stated Todd Palmatier was asked to compare the original <br /> Notice of Intent with what is on the ground and to core ih with ars <br /> amendment for everything that is on the ground that wasn ' t in the <br /> original notice . The order of Conditions says you can do what is <br /> on the plan and if ,you were to come in for a certificate of Compliance , <br />�. <br /> we would take the plan out and say yes or no based on whether what we <br /> saw there was on the plan . When we see what ' s there isn ' t on the plan , <br /> we need something in writing from you requesting the change . <br />{ 1r. Burgmann -agreed to request a change to conform to the new plan . <br /> Mr . Rosenberg asked if the driveway onf or red to the req u i regent for <br /> a permeable drive? <br /> Mr , Burgmann stated he was told by Tedd that it was brick laid on sand <br /> . with sand ,joints . <br /> Mrs . Marsters stated their cover letter asking for the amendment to <br /> the order of Conditions can spell out all of the changes and why they <br /> think this meets the order of Conditions . <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated the commission does not want to have . Cariglia. <br /> come in later and say the plan was approved with it set in cement . <br /> . The Commission asked for this to be brought up to date , once and for <br /> all . if it ever cores that there. is something put in here without <br /> permission , he will rake the notion that an order to remove it , <br /> summarily , regardless of it ' s merit , be issued . If it ever happens <br /> again , it would be his feeling it is someone thumbing his nose at <br /> the Commission . He stated this is his personal position . <br /> `. Burgmann stated , if it does happen again , he is entitled to <br /> whatever he gets . They will provide a letter stating the driveway <br /> complies with the original order of conditions although the dimen- <br /> sions are changed and any other changes between plans will be ex- <br /> plained in the cover letter . <br />