Laserfiche WebLink
conservation L m i i n <br /> March 23 , 1989 <br /> Page 6 - <br /> Mr . Coffey asked if it is valuable enough to her and Stratford Ponds <br /> to go through the entire proceedings knowing the Com misison has <br /> questions about whether it is doable without impact . <br /> Mrs . Farinon stated she would have to re-evaluate after tonight . If <br /> she goes back to Edgerton Development and states it will be tied up <br /> for another couple of months , they will prefer to put it back where <br /> it was . <br /> Mr . Ronbg stated they had a plan with no equipment going off the <br /> paved road and now the substitute plan which calls for that equip. <br /> meat going a great distance over unpaved areas which seems to in- <br /> evitably cause a lot more damage . <br /> Mrs . Farinon stated there will be an adverse impact for a short period <br /> of time by bringing the equipment down the bog road . It should not <br /> take more than one day . <br /> Ms Behrman stated the backhoe will not only cause damage to the road <br /> by it ' s weight but the adjoining vegetation will be impacted . <br /> Nor . Rosenberg asked , if taking out --4 ,000 cu .. ft . , how marry truck <br /> loads will that be <br /> It was noted with a sic wheeler it would be 50 trucks in there . <br /> Question was raised from the audience if the ancient way . was at the <br /> edge of th-e proposed site and it was stated it is . <br /> Also , if talking about using a crane , it is almost 120 feet from the <br /> road . He asked what size crane would be used . <br /> Mrs , Farinon stated replication cannot be done without causing some <br /> adverse effect . <br /> Ms Behrman stated , if this is what is wanted , the commission would <br /> need a new Notice of Intent to properly consider the application . <br /> Mrs . Farinon stated they are trying to save a sensitive area . If <br /> the Commission feels strongly about it , she would like to take those <br /> concerns back to Edgerton and they will most likely want to withdraw <br /> the application . <br /> Mr . Rosenberg stated in order to make a decision on this he would <br /> want a complete exposition of how each of the alternatives would be <br /> accomplished and an exposition of the probable effects on the environ- <br /> ment <br /> nvir n-vent of each of thea in order to weigh the relative adverse impacts <br /> Mr . Coffey asked if the wetland replication schedule was drawn up for <br /> this one or is it standard and was told it was standard . He asked if <br /> they were going to submit add i t i ori a l information i f they could make <br /> it site specific . Mrs . Fannon agreed . <br /> member of the audience pointed out there are a lot of Beech trees <br /> 10 inches in diameter or bigger in the roved area . Also , in the <br /> area approved now is a nesting site for; a pair of broad tailed hawks . <br /> Mrs . Farinon stated if' Edgerton wants her to stop proceeding with the <br /> alternative method she still would like to come back to the Commission <br />