My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/29/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
6/29/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2018 5:08:03 PM
Creation date
2/21/2018 1:49:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/29/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation Commission <br /> . gune 29, 1989 <br /> Page 2. <br /> Mr. Palmatier stated the areas -to the sides of the pool are not going to be <br /> disturbed. <br /> Mr, Sherman advised the plans are lacking the stamp of a professional land <br /> surveyor and professional engineer. <br /> HEARING To BE CLOSED UPON RECEIPT of REVISED PLANS WITH PROPER STAMPS. <br /> 7:45 Robert F. Spousta, 40 Ninigret Ave,, Continued from Juane 1 , 1989. <br /> CONTINUED To JULY 279 1989 AT THE REQUEST of THE APPLICANT. <br /> :00 Lloyd Gainsboro,, to construct and maintain an 8 ft, wide deck, timber pier, <br /> stairway, gangway and place a float at - 9 Keel Way. Doug Cameron of Braman <br /> Engineering presenting. The approval of Board of Appeals has been received, <br /> The float was reduced from 6 X 24 to 6 x 20. He suggested shifting the beginning <br /> of the walkway to avoid three trees, An oak tree on the east corner of the deck <br /> will remain also. <br /> Mrs. Simmons stated there is one on the west corner also and asked that the trees <br /> be noted on the plan. <br /> Mr. Burns stated no trees should be cut as it is open enough now. <br /> Mr. Cameron advised the existing walkway and dock will be removed,, <br /> Mr. Rosenberg asked for a copy of what was presented to the Board of Appeals. In <br /> their d oision it states plans were for a 6 X 24 float to replace an existing <br /> float,, n thing about a dock. <br /> Mr, Cameron stated plans submitted to the Board of Appeals included thisparticular <br /> plan minus some revisions that were made -as '-a result of that hearing ie, reduction <br /> i n f l oast..,s i ze, to approved 6 x 20 f l oat and an 8 foot w i de deck was i nc 1 uded. Th i s <br /> rev id plan was approved by the Board of Appeals. <br /> Ms Beh rm'an stated it may have been approved,,.: but not in writing, She also asked <br /> how it is proposed to remove the old pier. <br /> Ir. Cameron stated that pier will be the deck, the stringers will be lifted off <br /> and the piles cut off at grade. <br /> Ms Behrman asked how much of the marsh will be impacted by equipment and people. <br /> Mr, Cameron stated the work will be performed by barge. <br /> Ms Behrman asked if there is to be no foot access on the marsh and was told that <br /> was correct, all work on the pier will be done from the barge. she asked bow <br /> they were proposing to remove the old pier to be taken out., He stated that <br /> will be done by hand, mats could be put dower. Ms Behrman asked what kind of <br /> work area around that pier is proposed and was told 4 feet around the pier on <br /> either; side would be sufficient and no heavy equipment will be used. When <br /> asked how the pilings were to be removed Mr. Cameron stated they could be <br /> vibrated out from the barge with a crane boon extending out. She asked how <br /> much silt would be caused and was told they could put a silt curtain around the <br /> outside of the pier to minimize siltation. Silt or sediment on the marsh could <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.