6/29/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission June 29, 1989 Page 3. be removed, ar condition they could live with. They could show the work limit line around the existing pier o the plan. A requirement in the order could be to place gats on the marsh to give a visual delineation of the work limit, Supervision of the project could be accomplished with someone from their office or coordination with the. conservation Agent at the time work on those piles for the existing pier is undertaken, " The Shellfish agent stated that as far as shellfish is concerned there is an intertidal bed of soft shell clams that can be avoided,, Off shore there is a very deep muck with few shellfish, He felt the float should be pulled back 4-6 feet- IM-11. , Mr. Cameron referred to the Darcy- abars y float 8 X 16 feet, 128 Square feet, and the Mary Hoar float whi h is 12 x 16 feet or 192 square feet, The Gainsboro float is 120 square feet. Mrs. Simmons asked Paul how he felt about the removal of the pier. Mr. Someryille advised, if they come in on a high tide with a barge, they could cut the pilings with chain saws and lift the whole deck. Ms Behr an asked if it would be better to cut the piling off and leave the bases in and Mr, Somerville agreed it would be. Mr. Rosenberg suggested pulling the float back to the end of the eelg rass. Mr. Somerville stated he would rather see them under water; 4 feet is not much, but it is a compromise. Mr. Rosenberg asked why a 9 foot ramp was necessary. Mr, Cameron stated it was needed to be able to get down from the top of the deck to the float. Mrs. Simmons advised the present pier has been repaired and elongated and a new float put on without any permission from the Commission. Also, the revegetation with the orders for the house has not been completed. Mr. Sherman stated in check i-ng the order of conditions,, he noticed the gutters called for are not installed on the addition. Mr. Burns stated theme are gutters on a portion of the structure. Mr. Cameron advised one of the builders called him and told him there is two feet of crushed stone to address runoff from the roof to act as a drywell . f Mrs. Simmons stated it is realized New Seabury ARC does not like gutters but they were conditioned. Mr, Burns asked if a Certificate of Compliance was requested and Mr. Sherman told him Mr. Gainsboro realizes it is not ready for that. Mr. Cameron stated to address the pier situation, it was brought to his attention by Paul 'Somerville and their survey crew measured what is there and he checked the permits issued to Mr. Allicandro and it shows a pier and a 6 X 6 float attached to the pier to act as a ramp. He has authorization for a 6 x 6 float and there is a 6 x 8 float there now. Mr, Sherman stated it is also longer than the original plan. Ms Behrman asked if the plan is what is on the ground.