Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> i <br /> June 29, 1989 <br /> Page 5. <br /> Mr. Donovan stated the lot drops off drastically. Ms Dehran suggested a house <br /> with a better design for the lot, <br /> Mr, Rosenberg stated the Commission does not want the wall steeper, they want it <br /> to follow the existing slope. They want to destroy a stable bank here in order <br /> to create land. <br /> 1 . Donovan stated he thought this is what was agreed upon. He spent another <br /> $1000 to move the house out of the wetland. <br /> Mrs, Simmons asked if the existing road will remain, <br /> Mr. Burns asked what contours they could live with. Mr. Cook stated they could <br /> move it in and steepen it up.. <br /> Mr, Rosenberg stated the Commission does not want the creation of land here <br /> artificially, He suggested a vertical flat wall at the 20 Foot contour. He <br /> asked the house elevation and was told it is 28. <br /> Mr, Donovan stated he has no objection to starting the wall higher. Mr. Rosenberg <br /> suggested the 20 or 22 foot contour. <br /> Mr, Donovan asked what is the maximum distance from the edge of the house allowable. <br /> Mr, Rosenberg asked if he could live with 10 feet and Mr. Donovan stated no. <br /> Nor* Rosenberg asked what wi.1-1. happen to the read and Mr.",,Donovan asked what did <br /> the Commission want him to do with it; it's a- walkway down to the back. <br /> Mrs, Marsters stated it has 125 yards of cut and suggested he eliminate that. <br /> Mr. Donovan agreed. <br /> Mr. Coffer stated with a walkout basement and a cantilevered deck he could save <br /> all that money on the wall . <br /> Mr. Cook asked why the neighbor has concrete everywhere, Ms Behrman pointed out <br /> that was done at the state level , The Commission had denied many things. <br /> harl e s- Tar l an i an, abutter on Lot 9, stated he is concerned with the placement of <br /> the house. He objects to it being right at the top ofthe hill . He advised tyre <br /> Commission's concern in 1984 was not being able to see these houses. <br /> Ms Dehrman stated she did not recall this site even being discussed and she sat on <br /> the hearings. The concern was with the house being so close to the salt marsh, <br /> They did not like the site at all and she remembered rather acrimonious discussions <br /> with the engineer presenting at that hearing. The Commission got no where and was <br /> told this is what the applicant wanted and quite a few things were denied. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated the one thing that was made very clear was that when Lot 8 <br /> was built upon, it would have to be the subject of a separate Notice of Intent <br /> and it would be considered at that time. Each lot was a. separate application. <br /> Mr. Ta 1 n i an stated one of the concerns was the visibility of these houses at the <br /> top of the hill , <br /> Ms Dehrman stated this Commission had no concerns with visibility whatsoever, that <br /> was never raised and is not within the Commission's legal purview. <br />