Laserfiche WebLink
Oonom <br /> August 249 1989 <br /> Page 3, <br /> Ms <br /> Lehrman stated i somebody buys the house after they, we would be <br /> taking on trust they would do the same thing. She would rather see a <br /> system go in that would not be a chemical insult to the area. <br /> Mr. Monsen asked what requirements are being made of the people that <br /> have the pools there now. Mr. Rosenberg advised almost all are Ozone. <br /> Mr. Hansenstated the poo l , neat door to them is 4-5 years o 1 d with <br /> Chlorine and it seems there is no protection there either. <br /> Ms Behrma'n stated the Commission is trying not to repeat past mistakes <br /> years ago, there was not this ultraviolet option. <br /> Mir. Hansen asked if ultraviolet was the same as Ozone. <br /> MsJohnson advised they asked the pool people what was the best they <br /> could do and they said this was better than Ozone. <br /> Ms Behro n stated this is chemical treatment chlorine, as an alterna- <br /> tive to the use of chlorine there is an ultraviolet system that dis- <br /> infects, as it were, the water* <br /> Ms Johnson stated that would be fine, they don' t have any objection, <br /> They would be happy to do whatever the Commission thinks should be <br /> done. <br /> Mr. Hansen asked if that would obviate the need for chlorine <br /> altogether and was told it would. <br /> i <br /> Mr. Coffey stated occasionally the system would have to be shocked <br /> with chlorine, but it would not be the chronic use. <br /> Ms Johnson stated if this were required they would comply. <br /> i <br /> i <br /> Mrs. Simmons asked how the dry ell would be built and was told it <br /> would be just like the pool . She questioned where it was located and <br /> noted it is not on the plan. <br /> Ms Asmusstated it is listed on the plan that it will be under the <br /> decd <br /> M . Rosenberg asked for the dimensions of the drywell and Ms Asmus <br /> agreed to note this on the plan. <br /> Mrs. Simmons stated the type of pump and rate of flow should also be <br /> noted. <br /> Mr. Coffey questioned the trees to be removed. Ms Asmus stated she <br /> rated it on the addition to the notice of Intent, approximately 16 <br /> - <br /> 4" diameter or greater will have to be removed. The removal of trees <br /> will not create any significant impact to the area. These trees have <br /> not been marked. <br /> Ms Behrman asked where the 11 ' contour is located and is it in the <br /> flood hazard zone. A FIMA nap was referenced. <br /> Mir. Rosenberg asked the height at the top of the pool and was told 830 <br /> They will be just above grade. <br /> Ms Behrman stated they are below the flood hazard zone. The lower <br /> elevation of the house is ; the pool is going to be at the , <br />