10/19/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

f Conservation Commission October 19, 1989 Page 4. lU TA - Continued John 8lavinsky presented abutter receipts. Ms Behrman questioned the owner of record? Mr. S l a i n sky stated they are in because of the drainage pr blern. At the inter- section nter- se tion of Timberlane Drive there is a catch basin. On the original filing, the driveway was on the northerly side of the house,, with any rain, there is a problem on this lot. on sunday there was a puddle on this lot 601 X 601 61' deep. They propose to pint in a driveway parallel to T imber l ane Drive pitching back to the street. There is a drainage easement but there was never anything put in below ground. Mr. Burns pointed to an area on the plan -where a pipe comes out. Mr, Slavinsky stated it is not working. Ms Behrman pointed out it was not permitted by the Commission either. Mr. Sherman pointed out this was not on this lot. Mr. Blavinsky advised on the original order there was no request for a deck, there is a deck, there was no request for the landscape tie retaining wall , it is there, 2 ft. high. Nis Behrman stated this is after-the-fact on ars existing stru tune for that part. She asked if there were landscape plans on the new filing and was told there was not. She asked how much clearing in the back? Mr. Slavinsky stated the deck is within the limit of work. Mr. Coffey agreed that erosion-wise this driveway would work better but does not address the fact that it is contributing more water all by itself and the catch basin needs cleaning, if nothing else. He asked if it was in the applicant's best interest to pitch in on that? Mr. slavinsky agreed it was. Mr. Sherman advised the work limit was placed too close to the house and he told them to move it out, thea the deck was within it. However, at the time he didn't realize the deck was not permitted. He stated he would like to clear up the ownership matter. It was noted the Assessor's attestation was for Eppinger & Russell Co. Mr, Coffey questioned the Beech tree. Mr. 8l av in sky advised a letter from an arborist states the Beech tree must come down. Ms Behrman questioned the additional fill . Mr. Slavinsi y stated the 30 yds. is for the driveway.ay. Ms Behrman stated fill was broughtire a ,year ago, when -it was going to be a park. Janet Walsh , an abutter, advised Mr. Regan is renting the house, she has seen the lease the tenant signed. Ms Behrman stated a certain amount of fill was permitted in the original applic- ation, not to be brought onto the lot. She asked how much fill has been deposited on the lot. Mr. Slavinsi y stated there was excavation for the foundation. Mr. Walsh advised there were 4 - 10 wheel trucks, 10 yards each. When Mr, Regan came back for the permit on the Douse, one of the conditions was that there would be no more fill . Nis Behrman stated the already deposited fill should be part of this Notice of Intent, This was observed and is part of several enforcement orders.