11/30/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

i Conservation commisslori November 30, 1989 Page 10. Mr. Somerville was queried as to whether 50 ft. around the float would be sufficient for soundings. He suggested to go out to the property line and go 10 feet. Ms Beh rman questioned indigenous plants and asked if the location is the bottom of the bank? Mr. Hayes stated the plants are already in; they were ones that were there when the stairway was pint i n. The plan was developed for a DEQE number and this one for DEP with one part done and one requested. Nor. Somerville was asked if he could provide an evaluation prior to Ir. Hayes return and he stated he would. Mr. Coffey suggested if an EI 's involved, there was no point in his returning in a hurry. Ms Behr rman stated it could be denied without prejudice, CONTINUED To JANUARY 11 , 1990 8:00 George Regan, continued from October 9, Dave Sanicki presenting. This was originally a request for an Amended order for an added deck. Unknown to his firm, additional fill had been brought onto the site and the Commission requested an amended Notice of Intent which is now on file. The deck dimension is now shown on the plan and rip-rap has been changed to a D-shape back to Tamberlane Drive. The deck is shown as presently constructed. A landscape plan was requested as someone had cut down an excess of trees, a replanting plan was put before the Commission. Mrs. Simmons asked if the name on the plan had been resolved. Mr. Sanicki stated the property changed brands two times, with research at the Registry of Deeds and an order from the registry, the owner of record is shown. Mr. Sherman advised when he went to the site when the tree was being cut down,, the crew told him Mr. Regan directed them to cut down the tree and the assumption was that Nor. Regan owns the property. Nor. Sanicki stated it is now up to date to the best of his knowledge. 1s Beh man expressed concern with the seed lawn on the landscape plan, between the deck and santuit Pond, as the bark is very steep. She pointed to the trees in- dicated on the bank and stated the implication is there is going to be more clearing. Mr, Sanicki stated the end of the seeded lawn towards the pond area would have been the work limit which had been disturbed and trees cut. The proposal through Barnstable Folding Company is to reseed that section that has been disturbed, if the Commission desires that this be revegetated in an alternate means, he requested this be done in the order. Mr. Sherman stated there should not be seeded lawn in front of the deck. . In answer to a question, Mr. Sanicki advised the fill is within the ,jurisdiction of the Commission. Ms Behrman agreed the proposed driveway is an improvement on the former driveway,