Laserfiche WebLink
4 Conservation Commission <br /> November 30, 1989 <br /> Page 8. <br /> 7:45 Vincent S. Por i e l l o, Jr. for the proposed placement of a pre-constructed <br /> 30' X 3211 ramp between an existing walkway and float at 9 Tide Run, Norman <br /> Hayes of BSC Group gave a history of the project. He advised the Commission <br /> was taken aback previously by the iron pilings that held a floating dock in <br /> place* He advised his client, Mort West, that in the opinion of the Commission, <br /> a float that was affixed was a dock and the Commission would prefer to see <br /> float, The float Nor. West had did not meet the definitions and would therefore <br /> require a Chapter 91 license. They have removed a permanent iron pipe and <br /> devised a float that is bottom anchored, as per the Commission's request.", <br /> Nor. Hayes stated he was at this hone this evening and could attest that the <br /> pipes have been removed, The float, being seasonal , is not on the property. <br /> He had prepared a shellfish report. The float will remain seasonal and the <br /> proposed aluminum connect ion sta-irway to the float will allow for the sunlight <br /> to reach the bottom of the bay and allow passage beneath. <br /> Ms Beh rma n noted there is only one set of plans in the file. Mr. Hayes agreed <br /> to provide an additional sets <br /> Mr. Sherman advised he talked with Paul Somerville this morning and they have <br /> been advised by CANS the bottom-anchored float has never been conditioned and <br /> is applicable under the Wetlands Act. <br /> Mr. Hayes stated he was not suggesting that it has been permitted and that is <br /> what he is here for tonight. <br /> Mr, Sherman asked if it was for the float and the ramp p and Mr. Hayes stated it was. <br /> Mr, Burns stated the not i ce states it has been approved by the Harbormaster and <br /> has a Board of Appeals special permit. <br /> Mrs. Simmons asked where the ramp will be stored. <br /> Mr, Hayes stated he would like to say it will be stored in Mr. Nest's garage, but <br /> is not sure of this <br /> Mr. Burns questioned this being possible with a ramp 32 feet long. <br /> Mrs. Simmons stated the Commission will condition the storage, <br /> Nis Beh rr an a ked if the float i s 20 feet long or in two pieces? <br /> Mr. Hayes did not know if it was 2 - 10 foot section connected with an aluminum <br /> pipe or one contiguous float. It isn't there so he was unsure. <br /> Mrs. Simmons asked how the ramp is going to be put into position each spring_. <br /> Ir. Hayes advised two ren can carry them and place them in position. It will be <br /> Put in 'manually, not by machine. <br /> Nis Behrm n quesitoned the depth of grater around the float and stated that should <br /> be on the plan, It's not on the plan as part of the surveyor' s stamped attestation <br /> of depth and there is no attestation on the shellfish report. <br /> Mr. Hayes stated they can go out and take measurements at that particular distance <br /> and provide this to the Commission. Corrections to be rade to the plan with re- <br /> vised pians provided to the Commission. When he did the shellfish report, the <br /> water 25 feet beyond the float was 5 feet deep. Around the float varies from <br /> 2-1/2' at the southern end to 3-1/2 feet at the eastern end, depending on the tide. <br />