Laserfiche WebLink
Subject to Coastal Stora Flowage, with no performance <br /> standards. There is no impact. <br /> The plan was reviewed. The existing gravel roadway is there <br /> now. It will be to effect continuation. <br /> Ir. Sherman will add a condition that this berm be <br /> maintained. <br /> Mr. Fitzsimmons asked if it is in the AC It is not. <br /> Mr. Sharpe asked if the road will remain the same width It <br /> will he much the same. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg asked if there will be any provision for <br /> preventing people from parking on that road? <br /> There was discussion of the newspaper release that when the <br /> 200 car lot was full, roadside parking would be permitted. <br /> Mr, Botelho stated par .9ng, engineering-wise, would not be <br /> possible; it has not been designed for parking <br /> Mr. Fitzsimmons stated the bicycle path is new and asked if <br /> it is conceptual? <br /> Ir. Hotelho stated it is a more expanded design not acted <br /> upon, they are only planning t pave, <br /> Public comments: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to close with the stipulation <br /> that the berm at station 8, 00 on the east side of the <br /> road be maintained. unanimous vote. <br /> CLO ,, <br /> 9:20 MAS S. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT for the <br /> construction of the overdune boardwalk crossing at South Cape <br /> Beach State Park. Karst Hooge3oom presenting. <br /> Nr. Sherman stated there was an Issue of abutter <br /> notification, they are correct that they do not have to <br /> notify abutters, DFP has guidelines for large projects that <br /> they only have to notify within 1000 feet which would be only <br /> themselves. <br /> Mr, Johansen found deficiencies in completeness. Nothing was <br /> staked in the field. Nor. Sherman stated comments should he <br /> entertained but it could not be acted upon tonight. The DEP <br /> number is missing. Mr. Hoogeboom advised the number is SE <br /> -Io. <br /> Mr, Sherman asked if work is in the ACFC It is. That is <br /> not shown on the drawings. The attached drawing has it <br /> shown. Nr. Hoogeboom advised this project, for bidding and <br /> construction purposes, was combined with another project. <br /> Also, it is 'n the wetland restriction area and there is no <br /> proof of mailing, Pyr. Hoogeboom stated they sent that, along <br />